Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 18;14(7):e26988.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.26988. eCollection 2022 Jul.

No Difference Between Anchorless and Traditional Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Clinical Comparison

Affiliations

No Difference Between Anchorless and Traditional Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Clinical Comparison

Lucas Haase et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Shoulder instability and recurrent dislocations are common problems encountered by orthopedic surgeons and are frequently associated with a Bankart lesion. These are classically treated with either open or arthroscopic repair utilizing traditional suture anchors, though anchorless fixation techniques have recently been developed as an alternate fixation method that reduces native bone loss and has comparable pull-out strength. Methods A retrospective review was performed at a single institution for patients who underwent Bankart repair from January 2008 through February 2014. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaires were mailed to 35 patients with anchorless fixation and 35 age-, gender-, and surgeon-matched patients with traditional suture anchors. Statistical analysis was performed comparing re-dislocation, additional surgery, and ASES scores with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results Eleven patients in the anchorless implant group and 15 patients in the anchor group completed the questionnaire. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years in the anchorless group and 5.6 years in the anchor group (p=0.04). The number of implants was 4.82 in the anchorless group and 3.87 in the anchor group (p = 0.04). No difference was found in re-dislocation rates (p = 0.80) or additional surgery on the affected shoulder (p = 0.75). ASES scores were found to have no statistical difference (89.89 for the anchorless group versus 85.37 for the anchor group; p = 0.78). Conclusion In patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart lesion repair with traditional anchors compared to anchorless fixation, there appears to be no difference in shoulder re-dislocation rates, recurrent ipsilateral shoulder surgery, or ASES scores.

Keywords: bankart; comparison; shoulder arthroscopy; shoulder instability; suture anchor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Bar chart depicting the difference in ASES scores between the two groups.
ASES: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arthroscopic Bankert repair and open Bristow procedure in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with osseous glenoid lesions in collision athletes. Tasaki A, Morita W, Nozaki T, Yonekura Y, Saito M, Phillips BB, Kitamura N. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:23259671211008274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Varacallo M, Musto MA, Mair SD. Treasure Island: StatPearls [Internet]; 2021. Anterior Shoulder Instability. - PubMed
    1. Operative management options for traumatic anterior shoulder instability in patients younger than 30 years. Davis DE, Abboud JA. Orthopedics. 2015;38:570–576. - PubMed
    1. Surgical treatment outcomes after primary vs recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Barlow JD, Grosel T, Higgins J, Everhart JS, Magnussen RA. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10:222–230. - PMC - PubMed
    1. History of surgical intervention of anterior shoulder instability. Levy DM, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25:0–50. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources