Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 3:13:944608.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.944608. eCollection 2022.

Development and validation of a prediction nomogram for a 6-month unfavorable prognosis in traumatic brain-injured patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy: An observational study

Affiliations

Development and validation of a prediction nomogram for a 6-month unfavorable prognosis in traumatic brain-injured patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy: An observational study

Zhiji Tang et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to develop and validate a risk-prediction nomogram to predict a 6-month unfavorable prognosis in patients with traumatic brain-injured (TBI) undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy (DC).

Methods: The clinical data of 391 TBI patients with primary DC who were admitted from 2012 to 2020 were reviewed, from which 274 patients were enrolled in the training group, while 117 were enrolled in the internal validation group, randomly. The external data sets containing 80 patients were obtained from another hospital. Independent predictors of the 6-month unfavorable prognosis were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Furthermore, a nomogram prediction model was constructed using R software. After evaluation of the model, internal and external validations were performed to verify the efficiency of the model using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and the calibration plots.

Results: In multivariate analysis, age(p = 0.001), Glasgow Score Scale (GCS) (p < 0.001), operative blood loss of >750 ml (p = 0.045), completely effaced basal cisterns (p < 0.001), intraoperative hypotension(p = 0.001), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of >36 (p = 0.012) were the early independent predictors for 6-month unfavorable prognosis in patients with TBI after primary DC. The AUC for the training, internal, and external validation cohorts was 0.93 (95%CI, 0.89-0.96, p < 0.0001), 0.89 (95%CI, 0.82-0.94, p < 0.0001), and 0.90 (95%CI, 0.84-0.97, p < 0.0001), respectively, which indicated that the prediction model had an excellent capability of discrimination. Calibration of the model was exhibited by the calibration plots, which showed an optimal concordance between the predicted 6-month unfavorable prognosis probability and actual probability in both training and validation cohorts.

Conclusion: This prediction model for a 6-month unfavorable prognosis in patients with TBI undergoing primary DC can evaluate the prognosis accurately and enhance the early identification of high-risk patients.

Keywords: decompressive craniectomy; nomogram; prognosis; traumatic brain injury; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Nomogram to predict the probability of 6-month prognosis in patients with TBI undergoing primary DC (when using this nomogram, the value of each status of the patient will be located on each variable axis, and a vertical line will be drawn to determine the score of each variable value. The total score of the sum of all variable values is on the total score axis. The total score axis corresponds to the probability of a poor prognosis).
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves for the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, respectively. (A) Training cohorts (B) internal validation cohorts (C) external validation cohorts (AUC = 0.93 vs. 0.89 vs. 0.90).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration plots of the nomogram for the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, respectively. (A) Training cohorts (B) internal validation cohorts (C) external validation cohorts.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carney N, Totten A, O'Reilly C, Ullman J, Hawryluk G, Bell M, et al. . Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, 4th edition. Neurosurgery. (2017) 80:6–15. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper D, Rosenfeld J, Murray L, Arabi Y, Davies A, D'Urso P, et al. . Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364:1493–502. 10.1056/NEJMoa1102077 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hutchinson P, Kolias A, Timofeev I, Corteen E, Czosnyka M, Timothy J, et al. . Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:1119–30. 10.1056/NEJMoa1605215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wettervik T, Lenell S, Nyholm L, Howells T, Lewén A, Enblad P. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: usage and clinical outcome in a single centre. Acta Neurochir. (2018) 160:229–37. 10.1007/s00701-017-3418-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang C, Zhang J, Zhu G, Guo H, Gao F, Wang B, et al. . Effects of primary decompressive craniectomy on the outcomes of serious traumatic brain injury with mass lesions, and independent predictors of operation decision. World Neurosurg. (2021) 148:E396–405. 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.158 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources