The commercialization of biospecimens from Indigenous Peoples: A scoping review of benefit-sharing
- PMID: 35991662
- PMCID: PMC9386140
- DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.978826
The commercialization of biospecimens from Indigenous Peoples: A scoping review of benefit-sharing
Abstract
Background: There is ongoing and increasing interest in the commercialization of biospecimen-derived products from Indigenous Peoples. Discourse on benefit-sharing specifically in the context of the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples biospecimens are currently lacking. A better understanding of the potential ethical imperatives is in need of exploration on this emerging topic. This review sought to elucidate through categorization the current discourse in the peer-reviewed literature on the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples' biospecimens from a benefit-sharing perspective.
Methods: A scoping review methodology was utilized to perform a search of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Google Scholar. A two-stage screening process was used to assess the relevance of any included articles with subsequent manual open coding of articles. Content analysis was applied to identify the main categories and sub-categories within the article data.
Results: Thirty-three articles met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Four overarching categories from the included articles were identified regarding the most common discourse on the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples' biospecimens from a benefit-sharing perspective, including: exploitation through biocolonialism, sovereignty and Indigenous rights, ethical considerations for benefit-sharing, and guidelines and standards concerns.
Conclusion: This scoping review highlighted the crucial need to keep Indigenous communities at the center of research projects, ensuring any benefits, advancement, and potential commercial profits are returned to communities through clear and ethical agreements. We encourage all research institutions and institutional ethical review bodies to better clarify the collective needs and interests of Indigenous communities while centering their sovereignty and rights within the research process as it pertains to potential biospecimen product commercialization.
Keywords: Indigenous Peoples; benefit-sharing; biospecimens; commercialization; scoping review.
Copyright © 2022 Tone-Pah-Hote and Redvers.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Culturally safe and ethical biomarker and genomic research with Indigenous peoples-a scoping review.BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 25;2(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00102-0. BMC Glob Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39681973 Free PMC article.
-
Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Data: a contribution toward Indigenous Research Sovereignty.Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 May 4;8:1173805. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1173805. eCollection 2023. Front Res Metr Anal. 2023. PMID: 37215248 Free PMC article.
-
Indigenous knowledge around the ethics of human research from the Oceania region: A scoping literature review.Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2021 Oct 9;16(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13010-021-00108-8. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2021. PMID: 34625108 Free PMC article.
-
Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers.Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01503-6. Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33148328 Free PMC article.
-
Elements of Successful Food Sovereignty Interventions within Indigenous Communities in the United States and Canada: a Systematic Review.Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Jul 18;7(9):101973. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.101973. eCollection 2023 Sep. Curr Dev Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37635710 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Ethical principles of traditional Indigenous medicine to guide western psychedelic research and practice.Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Dec 16;18:100410. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100410. eCollection 2023 Feb. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022. PMID: 36844020 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Why community consultation matters in genomic research benefit-sharing models.Genome Res. 2024 Feb 7;34(1):1-6. doi: 10.1101/gr.278308.123. Genome Res. 2024. PMID: 38296591 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Editorial: Toward a better understanding and application of benefit sharing in genomic and global health research.Front Genet. 2023 Sep 27;14:1291181. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1291181. eCollection 2023. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 37829281 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ethical challenges of conducting and reviewing human genomics research in Malaysia: An exploratory study.Dev World Bioeth. 2024 Dec;24(4):331-341. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12435. Epub 2023 Nov 23. Dev World Bioeth. 2024. PMID: 37997006
References
-
- Reardon J, TallBear K. “Your DNA is our history”, genomics, anthropology, and the construction of whiteness as property. Curr Anthropol. (2012) 53(Suppl. 5):S233–45. 10.1086/662629 - DOI
-
- Wu AO. Surpassing the material: the human rights implications of informed consent in bioprospecting cells derived from indigenous people groups. Wash U L Q. (2000) 78:979–1004. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous