Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 4:9:978826.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.978826. eCollection 2022.

The commercialization of biospecimens from Indigenous Peoples: A scoping review of benefit-sharing

Affiliations

The commercialization of biospecimens from Indigenous Peoples: A scoping review of benefit-sharing

Tarlynn Tone-Pah-Hote et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: There is ongoing and increasing interest in the commercialization of biospecimen-derived products from Indigenous Peoples. Discourse on benefit-sharing specifically in the context of the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples biospecimens are currently lacking. A better understanding of the potential ethical imperatives is in need of exploration on this emerging topic. This review sought to elucidate through categorization the current discourse in the peer-reviewed literature on the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples' biospecimens from a benefit-sharing perspective.

Methods: A scoping review methodology was utilized to perform a search of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Google Scholar. A two-stage screening process was used to assess the relevance of any included articles with subsequent manual open coding of articles. Content analysis was applied to identify the main categories and sub-categories within the article data.

Results: Thirty-three articles met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Four overarching categories from the included articles were identified regarding the most common discourse on the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples' biospecimens from a benefit-sharing perspective, including: exploitation through biocolonialism, sovereignty and Indigenous rights, ethical considerations for benefit-sharing, and guidelines and standards concerns.

Conclusion: This scoping review highlighted the crucial need to keep Indigenous communities at the center of research projects, ensuring any benefits, advancement, and potential commercial profits are returned to communities through clear and ethical agreements. We encourage all research institutions and institutional ethical review bodies to better clarify the collective needs and interests of Indigenous communities while centering their sovereignty and rights within the research process as it pertains to potential biospecimen product commercialization.

Keywords: Indigenous Peoples; benefit-sharing; biospecimens; commercialization; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adapted PRISMA diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Year of publication for included articles.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garrison NA. Genomic justice for native Americans: impact of the havasupai case on genetic research. Sci Technol Hum Values. (2013) 38:201–23. 10.1177/0162243912470009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reardon J, TallBear K. “Your DNA is our history”, genomics, anthropology, and the construction of whiteness as property. Curr Anthropol. (2012) 53(Suppl. 5):S233–45. 10.1086/662629 - DOI
    1. Dodson M, Williamson R. Indigenous peoples and the morality of the Human Genome Diversity Project. J Med Ethics. (1999) 25:204–8. 10.1136/jme.25.2.204 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dalton R. Tribe blasts “exploitation” of blood samples. Nature. (2002) 420:111. 10.1038/420111a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu AO. Surpassing the material: the human rights implications of informed consent in bioprospecting cells derived from indigenous people groups. Wash U L Q. (2000) 78:979–1004. - PubMed

Publication types