Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1987 Aug;61(8):2607-13.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.61.8.2607-2613.1987.

Antigenic comparison of feline coronavirus isolates: evidence for markedly different peplomer glycoproteins

Comparative Study

Antigenic comparison of feline coronavirus isolates: evidence for markedly different peplomer glycoproteins

S A Fiscus et al. J Virol. 1987 Aug.

Abstract

The antigenic relationships among seven feline coronavirus isolates were investigated by using a panel of 26 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). The MAbs were categorized into five immunoreactive groups which were used to delineate two antigenic types of feline coronaviruses. One antigenic type included the more virulent feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) isolates (FIPV-UCD-1, FIPV-UCD-4, FIPV-TN406, FIPV-DF2, and FIPV-79-1146), whereas the second antigenic type was composed of the avirulent isolate FIPV-UCD-2. The feline enteric coronavirus isolate FECV-79-1683 shared some characteristics of both of the major antigenic groups. Epitopes on the nucleocapsid and envelope polypeptides were in general highly conserved among both antigenic types, although a few type-specific antigenic sites were discriminated. The most striking finding was the marked antigenic difference in the peplomer (E2) glycoproteins between the two antigenic types. Seven anti-E2 MAbs reacted with one antigenic type of E2, whereas seven other anti-E2 MAbs recognized a different antigenic form of E2. None of the 14 anti-E2 MAbs reacted with all of the isolates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Vet Res. 1976 May;37(5):567-72 - PubMed
    1. J Virol. 1986 Aug;59(2):463-71 - PubMed
    1. Arch Virol. 1978;58(1):45-53 - PubMed
    1. J Virol. 1980 Jan;33(1):449-62 - PubMed
    1. Vet Med Small Anim Clin. 1980 May;75(5):811-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources