Examining academic performance across gender differently: Measurement invariance and latent mean differences using bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals
- PMID: 35992444
- PMCID: PMC9388777
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896638
Examining academic performance across gender differently: Measurement invariance and latent mean differences using bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals
Abstract
The aim of this study was threefold: First, to examine the dimensionality of the construct of General Academic Ability (GAA) at the subscale level providing additional insights over and above on the conceptualization of the construct. Second, to explore different degrees of measurement invariance of the GAA across gender using more recent advancements in the examination of Measurement Invariance (i.e., Bias-Corrected bootstrap Confidence Intervals). Third, to examine gender differences across the different facets of the GAA at the latent mean level. The sample consisted of 1,800 high school graduates who applied for higher education in Saudi Arabia. The results from the analysis indicated that the hierarchical model with one higher-order factor (i.e., general academic ability) and four lower-order cognitive factors (i.e., verbal ability, quantitative ability, scholastic aptitude, and GPA) exhibited an excellent fit to the data. In terms of the measurement invariance hypothesis, it was found that the hierarchical model exhibits full configural and metric invariance and partial scalar invariance. Finally, using the Latent Mean Difference procedure, the results showed gender differences in the Verbal and GPA domains. Although significant differences were also found in the Scholastic aptitude domain, this finding is not stable due to several non-invariant items within the domain. In both cases, females scored higher than males. Finally, regarding the higher-order factor (GAA), the results showed that females scored higher than males. There were no significant differences in the Quantitative domain.
Keywords: BC bootstrap confidence intervals; academic performance; gender differences; general academic ability; measurement invariance.
Copyright © 2022 Tsaousis and Alghamdi.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Abubakar R. B., Bada I. A. (2012). Age and gender as determinants of academic achievements in college mathematics. Asian J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 1, 121–127.
-
- Ajai J. T., Imoko B. I. (2015). Gender differences in mathematics achievement and retention scores: a case of problem-based learning method. Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci. 1, 45–50.
-
- Alamoudi A. A., Fallatah H. I., Eldakhakhny B. M., Kamel F. O., AlShawwa L. A., Elsamanoudy A. Z. (2021). Relationship between admission criteria and academic performance in basic science courses in health science colleges in KAU. BMC Med. Educ. 21:94. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02502-4, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Alanazi N. K. (2014). The Validity of the general Aptitude test (GAT) to Predict male Saudi students’ academic Performance in the first Semester. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.
-
- Aldurayheem A. (2022). The effectiveness of the general aptitude test in Saudi Arabia in predicting performance of English as a foreign language. PSU Research Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1108/PRR-01-2021-0002 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous