Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization
- PMID: 35993104
- PMCID: PMC9621110
- DOI: 10.1002/hast.1405
Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization
Abstract
Due to a history of coerced sterilization, a federal Medicaid sterilization policy mandates that a specific consent form be signed by a patient at least thirty days prior to when the patient undergoes sterilization. However, in contemporary obstetrical practice, the Medicaid sterilization policy serves as a policy-level barrier to autonomously desired care. We review the clinical and ethical implications of the current Medicaid sterilization policy. After discussing the utility and impact of waiting periods for other surgical procedures, we explore the psychology of time required for decision-making and consider scientific understanding of regret. We argue that the current Medicaid sterilization waiting period is clinically and ethically unjustifiable and that the policy ought to be revised in light of the goals, preferences, and concerns of the people most affected by it. While the need for continued protection against coercion remains, the current mandated waiting period does little to enforce the high-quality shared decision-making that is desired for sterilization counseling.
Keywords: Medicaid; bioethics; contraception; disparities; reproductive justice; sterilization; women's health.
© 2022 The Hastings Center.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest – None
Similar articles
-
Attitudes and beliefs of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding Medicaid postpartum sterilization - A qualitative study.Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 32858053 Free PMC article.
-
Using Deliberative and Qualitative Methods to Recommend Revisions to the Medicaid Sterilization Waiting Period.Womens Health Issues. 2020 Jul-Aug;30(4):260-267. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 11. Womens Health Issues. 2020. PMID: 32409262
-
Postpartum Patient Perspectives on the US Medicaid Waiting Period for Permanent Contraception.Open Access J Contracept. 2025 Feb 25;16:31-41. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S506703. eCollection 2025. Open Access J Contracept. 2025. PMID: 40028472 Free PMC article.
-
Informed consent and ethical issues pertaining to female sterilization-Scoping review.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;169(3):1037-1064. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16100. Epub 2025 Jan 4. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39754449 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mandatory Waiting Periods Before Abortion and Sterilization: Theory and Practice.Int J Womens Health. 2020 Jul 31;12:577-586. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S257178. eCollection 2020. Int J Womens Health. 2020. PMID: 32801935 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study.Contraception. 2024 Nov;139:110531. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110531. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Contraception. 2024. PMID: 38909745
-
Reproductive justice in post-Roe America: Impact of restricted abortion access on patients seeking permanent contraception.Contraception. 2023 May;121:109995. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109995. Epub 2023 Feb 25. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 36842605 Free PMC article.
-
Contraceptive uptake in postpartum people with and without opioid use disorder and opioid use with co-occurring substance use.Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Jun 24;12:100248. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100248. eCollection 2024 Sep. Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024. PMID: 39040479 Free PMC article.
-
Medicaid and Fulfillment of Postpartum Permanent Contraception Requests.Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May 1;141(5):918-925. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005130. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37103533 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rafter NH, “Claims-Making and Socio-cultural Context in the First U.S. Eugenics Campaign,” Social Problems 39, no. 1 (1992): 17–34;
- Schoen J, “Between Choice and Coercion: Women and the Politics of Sterilization in North Carolina, 1929-1975,” Journal of Women’s History 13, no. 1 (2001): 132–56;
- Stern AM et al., “California’s Sterilization Survivors: An Estimate and Call for Redress,” American Journal of Public Health 107, no. 1 (2017): 50–54. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kline W, Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005).
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 371. July 2007. Sterilization of Women, Including Those with Mental Disabilities,” Obstetrics and Gynecology 110, no. 1 (2007): 217–20; - PubMed
- Birnbaum M, “Eugenic Sterilization: A Discussion of Certain Legal, Medical, and Moral Aspects of Present Practices in Our Public Mental Institutions,” Journal of the American Medical Association 175, no. 11 (1961): 951–58; - PubMed
- Stern AM, “Sterilized in the Name of Public Health,” American Journal of Public Health 95, no. 7 (2005): 1128–38. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sterilization of Persons in Federally Assisted Family Planning Projects, 42 C.F.R 50(b).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical