Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb;42(2):309-344.
doi: 10.1002/jum.16088. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

New International Guidelines and Consensus on the Use of Lung Ultrasound

Affiliations
Review

New International Guidelines and Consensus on the Use of Lung Ultrasound

Libertario Demi et al. J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Following the innovations and new discoveries of the last 10 years in the field of lung ultrasound (LUS), a multidisciplinary panel of international LUS experts from six countries and from different fields (clinical and technical) reviewed and updated the original international consensus for point-of-care LUS, dated 2012. As a result, a total of 20 statements have been produced. Each statement is complemented by guidelines and future developments proposals. The statements are furthermore classified based on their nature as technical (5), clinical (11), educational (3), and safety (1) statements.

Keywords: A-lines; B-lines; COVID-19; LUS safety assurance; SARS-CoV-2; artificial intelligence; lung ultrasound; lung ultrasound protocols; lung ultrasound standardization; point of care ultrasound; post-COVID-19; quantitative ultrasound; sonographic interstitial syndrome; vertical artifacts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of ultrasound images displaying typical LUS patterns. Pleural line, horizontal artifacts (A‐lines), vertical artifacts (B‐lines), and consolidations are indicated by blue, white, green and red arrows, respectively.

References

    1. Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an exemple, design considerations and applications. Inf Manag 2004; 42:15–29.
    1. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5:37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santaguida P, Dolovich L, Oliver D, et al. Protocol for a Delphi consensus exercise to identify a core set of criteria for selecting health related outcome measures (HROM) to be used in primary health care. BMC Fam Pract 2018; 19:152. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boers M, Kirwan J, Tugwell P, Beaton D, Bingham CO, Conaghan PG. The OMERACT handbook; 2015. https://www.omeract.org/omeract_publications.php.2017. Accessed August 7, 2019.
    1. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986; 35:382–385. - PubMed