Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 27;72(724):e773-e779.
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0043. Print 2022 Nov.

Measuring continuity of care in general practice: a comparison of two methods using routinely collected data

Affiliations

Measuring continuity of care in general practice: a comparison of two methods using routinely collected data

Sally A Hull et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Despite well-documented clinical benefits of longitudinal doctor-patient continuity in primary care, continuity rates have declined. Assessment by practices or health commissioners is rarely undertaken.

Aim: Using the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) score this study set out to measure continuity across 126 practices in the mobile, multi-ethnic population of East London, comparing these scores with the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) responses to questions on GP continuity.

Design and setting: A retrospective, cross-sectional study in all 126 practices in three East London boroughs.

Method: The study population included patients who consulted three or more times between January 2017 and December 2018. Anonymised demographic and consultation data from the electronic health record were linked to results from Question 10 ('seeing the doctor you prefer') of the 2019 GPPS.

Results: The mean UPC score for all 126 practices was 0.52 (range 0.32 to 0.93). There was a strong correlation between practice UPC scores measured in the 2 years to December 2018 and responses to the 2019 GPPS Question 10, Pearson's r correlation coefficient, 0.62. Smaller practices had higher scores. Multilevel analysis showed higher continuity for patients ≥65 years compared with children and younger adults (β coefficient 0.082, 95% confidence interval = 0.080 to 0.084) and for females compared with males.

Conclusion: It is possible to measure continuity across all practices in a local health economy. Regular review of practice continuity rates can be used to support efforts to increase continuity within practice teams. In turn this is likely to have a positive effect on clinical outcomes and on satisfaction for both patients and doctors.

Keywords: continuity of patient care; health surveys; primary health care; routinely collected health data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Continuity scores (UPC) plotted against list size, for 126 GP practices in three neighbouring boroughs in East London between January 2017 and December 2018. (Each diamond represents a practice in one of the three London boroughs. The dotted line is the logarithmic trend line for all 126 practices. UPC = Usual Provider of Care.)

References

    1. Pereira Gray DJ, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, et al. Continuity of care with doctors — a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e021161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker R, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL, et al. Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2020 doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712289. . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hjortdahl P, Laerum E. Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ. 1992;304(6837):1287–1290. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warren JR, Falster MO, Tran B, et al. Association of continuity of primary care and statin adherence. PloS One. 2015;10(10):e0140008. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Youens D, Doust J, Robinson S, et al. Regularity and continuity of GP contacts and use of statins amongst people at risk of cardiovascular events. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(6):1656–1665. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources