Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 22;13(1):4928.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32677-3.

Ultramicroporous material based parallel and extended paraffin nano-trap for benchmark olefin purification

Affiliations

Ultramicroporous material based parallel and extended paraffin nano-trap for benchmark olefin purification

Peixin Zhang et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Selective paraffin capture from olefin/paraffin mixtures could afford high-purity olefins directly, but suffers from the issues of low separation selectivity and olefin productivity. Herein, we report an ultramicroporous material (PCP-IPA) with parallel-aligned linearly extending isophthalic acid units along the one-dimensional channel, realizing the efficient production of ultra-high purity C2H4 and C3H6 (99.99%). The periodically expanded and parallel-aligned aromatic-based units served as a paraffin nano-trap to contact with the exposed hydrogen atoms of both C2H6 and C3H8, as demonstrated by the simulation studies. PCP-IPA exhibits record separation selectivity of 2.48 and separation potential of 1.20 mol/L for C3H8/C3H6 (50/50) mixture, meanwhile the excellent C2H6/C2H4 mixture separation performance. Ultra-high purity C3H6 (99.99%) and C2H4 (99.99%) can be directly obtained through fixed-bed column from C3H8/C3H6 and C2H6/C2H4 mixtures, respectively. The record C3H6 productivity is up to 15.23 L/kg from the equimolar of C3H8/C3H6, which is 3.85 times of the previous benchmark material, demonstrating its great potential for those important industrial separations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Scheme and structure of PCP-IPA.
a Schematic illustration of the common paraffin-trap channel, b schematic illustration of the parallel and extended paraffin nano-trap channel, (c) the building blocks (CoII, DPG, and IPA organic ligand) and the 3D network topology of PCP-IPA, d the 1D channel structure of PCP-IPA (C, orange or grey-80%; H, white; N, blue; O, red; Co, light blue).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. The paraffin and olefin sorption in PCP-IPA.
a The C3H8, C3H6, C2H6, and C2H4 adsorption isotherms at 298 K; b IAST selectivity (c) comparison plot of C3H8/C3H6 (50/50 v/v) IAST selectivity among benchmark materials; comparison of PCP-IPA separation potential (ΔQ IAST) with reported benchmark MOFs based on IAST calculation from d C3H8/C3H6 (50/50 v/v) mixtures and e C2H6/C2H4 (50/50 v/v) mixtures. f Time-dependent gas uptake profiles of C3H8 at 50 mbar and 298 K.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. DFT-D calculated preferable binding sites for paraffins and olefins in PCP-IPA.
a C3H8, b C3H6, c C2H6, and d C2H4 binding sites in PCP-IPA. The closest contacts between framework atoms and the gas molecules are defined by the distances (in Å) and the distances include the Van der Waals radius of atoms. (Framework: C, gray-80%; H, white; N, blue; O, red; Co, light blue; Gas: C, orange; H, white).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Paraffin/olefin separation.
Dynamic breakthrough curves under 298 K and 1.0 bar of a C3H8/C3H6 (50/50 v/v) mixture, b C3H8/C3H6 (5/95 v/v) mixture, and c C2H6/C2H4 (50/50 v/v) with (hollow) or without water vapor (solid); comparison of high pure olefin productivity on PCP-IPA with reported benchmark materials for d C3H8/C3H6 (50/50 v/v) mixture and e C2H6/C2H4 (50/50 v/v) mixture; f recycling breakthrough tests for C3H8/C3H6 (5/95 v/v, red, 2.20 mL/min), C3H8/C3H6 (50/50 v/v, blue, 1.10 mL/min), C3H8/C3H6 (50/50 v/v, cyan, 2.20 mL/min) and C2H6/C2H4 (50/50 v/v, orange, 3.7 mL/min) separation with PCP-IPA under 298 K and 1.0 bar.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sholl DS, Lively RP. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature. 2016;532:435–437. doi: 10.1038/532435a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin JY. Molecular sieves for gas separation. Science. 2016;353:121–122. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2267. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu Y, Weckhuysen BM. Separation and purification of hydrocarbons with porous materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:18930–18949. doi: 10.1002/anie.202104318. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adil K, et al. Gas/vapour separation using ultra-microporous metal–organic frameworks: insights into the structure/separation relationship. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46:3402–3430. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00153C. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang L, et al. Energy-efficient separation alternatives: metal–organic frameworks and membranes for hydrocarbon separation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020;49:5359–5406. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00756C. - DOI - PubMed