Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 18:13:e12.
doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.12. eCollection 2022.

Efficacy of Photoinduced Photoacoustic Streaming and Diode Laser Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal, Sealer Penetration and Push-out Bond Strength

Affiliations

Efficacy of Photoinduced Photoacoustic Streaming and Diode Laser Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal, Sealer Penetration and Push-out Bond Strength

Latifa Mohamed Abdelgawad et al. J Lasers Med Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: The present study aimed to test the efficiency of photoinduced photoacoustic streaming using 2940 nm Er: YAG laser and 980 nm diode laser agitation on smear layer removal, sealer penetration and push-out bond strength. Methods: Sixty single canaled human permanent teeth were collected for this study. Specimens were grouped into three experimental groups (20 teeth in each group), depending on the activation protocol used for final irrigation: Group I (needle agitation), group II (980nm diode laser agitation) and group III (photon induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) using 2940 nm Er: YAG laser. The quantity of irrigant was standardized in all groups to 4 ml. The irrigant was activated for 40 seconds in different groups under continuous flow. Two teeth from each group were used to check the smear layer removal, and then the remaining teeth in each group were randomly divided into three equal experimental subgroups according to methods of evaluation used: subgroup A: Sealing ability evaluated by dye penetration method; subgroup B: SEM for sealer penetration; and subgroup C: Push-out bond strength assessed by the universal test machine. Results: As regards smear layer removal, results showed that the PIPS group had opened dentinal tubules, followed by the diode laser group, while the least cleaning effect was found in the Side-vented needle group. As for Sealing ability and dye penetration, a statistically significant difference was found between all of the three groups, with the Er:YAG laser (PIPS) having the best sealing ability and sealer penetration. Push-out bond strength results showed no statistically significant difference between diode and Er:YAG groups, with a significant difference between each of them and the Side-vented needle group. Conclusion: Using the diode or Er:YAG laser (PIPS) for irrigant activation led to better irrigant penetration and smear layer removal which subsequently led to obvious sealer penetration, better sealing, and strength properties of endodontic treated teeth.

Keywords: Diode laser; Er:YAG laser; PIPS; Push-out bond strength; Sealer penetration; laser agitation; smear layer removal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 6

Similar articles

References

    1. Abdelgawad LM, Asmail N, Latif SA, Safaan AM. Efficacy of diode laser and sonic agitation of Chlorhexidine and Silver-nanoparticles in infected root canals. Braz Dent Sci. 2020;23(3):1–7. doi: 10.14295/bds.2020.v23i3.1989. - DOI
    1. Akcay M, Arslan H, Mese M, Sahin NN. The effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, ultrasonically and sonically irrigation techniques on the push-out bond strength of a resin sealer to the root dentin. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(5):1055–61. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1332-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghorbanzadeh A, Aminsobhani M, Sohrabi K, Chiniforush N, Ghafari S, Shamshiri AR, Noroozi N. Penetration Depth of Sodium Hypochlorite in Dentinal Tubules after Conventional Irrigation, Passive Ultrasonic Agitation and Nd:YAG Laser Activated Irrigation. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(2):105–11. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turkel E, Onay EO, Ungor M. Comparison of Three Final Irrigation Activation Techniques: Effects on Canal Cleanness, Smear Layer Removal, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017;35(12):672–681. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4234. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carrilho E, Marto CM, Botelho MF, Girão H, Marques-Ferreira M. Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Diffusion of MTA Cement into the Root Canal Dentin. Materials (Basel) 2020;13(23):5472. doi: 10.3390/ma13235472. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources