Navigating the open innovation paradox: an integrative framework for adopting open innovation in pharmaceutical R&D in developing countries
- PMID: 35996639
- PMCID: PMC9386677
- DOI: 10.1007/s10961-022-09958-6
Navigating the open innovation paradox: an integrative framework for adopting open innovation in pharmaceutical R&D in developing countries
Abstract
In this paper, we combine evidence from eight Indian pharmaceutical firms with extant literature and global best practices to conceptualize an integrative framework addressing the open innovation paradox (OIP), i.e., the tension between intellectual protection and openness. Firms in developing countries face additional challenges in the adoption of open innovation, such as the prevalence of open science norms, weak technology transfer systems, and mistrust between universities and industry; therefore, they employ open innovation selectively for pharmaceutical research. Prior research has examined the strategies to resolve OIP in the context of developed countries; the integrative framework proposed in this paper describes strategies for resolving the OIP in the context of developing countries. This framework illuminates the coping processes of the case firms and provides guidelines to uplift and accelerate the adoption of open innovation strategies in developing countries' pharmaceutical sectors, and thus provides value to both theory and praxis.
Keywords: Collaboration; Licensing; Open innovation paradox; Patenting.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that would affect the research or the peer review procedure.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Collaborative university-industry R&D practices supporting the pharmaceutical innovation process: Insights from a bibliometric review.Drug Discov Today. 2022 Aug;27(8):2333-2341. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 10. Drug Discov Today. 2022. PMID: 35550437 Review.
-
A triple helix model for the diffusion of Industry 4.0 technologies in firms in the Marche Region.Open Res Eur. 2023 Nov 23;3:89. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15706.2. eCollection 2023. Open Res Eur. 2023. PMID: 38196780 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of network positions in scientific collaboration on pharmaceutical firms' technological innovation performance: Moderating roles of scientific collaboration strength and patent stock.Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;10:980845. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.980845. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36033805 Free PMC article.
-
Firms navigating through innovation spaces: a conceptualization of how firms search and perceive technological, market and productive opportunities globally.J Evol Econ. 2016;26(4):785-802. doi: 10.1007/s00191-016-0478-0. Epub 2016 Oct 4. J Evol Econ. 2016. PMID: 28163393 Free PMC article.
-
Racing to define pharmaceutical R&D external innovation models.Drug Discov Today. 2015 Mar;20(3):361-70. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Drug Discov Today. 2015. PMID: 25448753 Review.
References
-
- Agarwal SP, Gupta A, Dayal R. Technology transfer perspectives in globalising India (drugs and pharmaceuticals and biotechnology) The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2007;32(4):397–423. doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-9025-8. - DOI
-
- Ahn, J. M., Roijakkers N., Fini R., et al. (2019). Leveraging open innovation to improve society: past achievements and future trajectories. Wiley Online Library, 267–278.
-
- Albuquerque EdM. National systems of innovation and non-OECD countries: Notes about a rudimentary and tentative ‘typology’. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy. 1999;19(4):76. doi: 10.1590/0101-31571999-1089. - DOI
-
- Almirall E, Casadesus-Masanell R. Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Academy of Management Review. 2010;35(1):27–47. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577790. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources