Navigating the open innovation paradox: an integrative framework for adopting open innovation in pharmaceutical R&D in developing countries
- PMID: 35996639
- PMCID: PMC9386677
- DOI: 10.1007/s10961-022-09958-6
Navigating the open innovation paradox: an integrative framework for adopting open innovation in pharmaceutical R&D in developing countries
Abstract
In this paper, we combine evidence from eight Indian pharmaceutical firms with extant literature and global best practices to conceptualize an integrative framework addressing the open innovation paradox (OIP), i.e., the tension between intellectual protection and openness. Firms in developing countries face additional challenges in the adoption of open innovation, such as the prevalence of open science norms, weak technology transfer systems, and mistrust between universities and industry; therefore, they employ open innovation selectively for pharmaceutical research. Prior research has examined the strategies to resolve OIP in the context of developed countries; the integrative framework proposed in this paper describes strategies for resolving the OIP in the context of developing countries. This framework illuminates the coping processes of the case firms and provides guidelines to uplift and accelerate the adoption of open innovation strategies in developing countries' pharmaceutical sectors, and thus provides value to both theory and praxis.
Keywords: Collaboration; Licensing; Open innovation paradox; Patenting.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that would affect the research or the peer review procedure.
Figures
References
-
- Agarwal SP, Gupta A, Dayal R. Technology transfer perspectives in globalising India (drugs and pharmaceuticals and biotechnology) The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2007;32(4):397–423. doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-9025-8. - DOI
-
- Ahn, J. M., Roijakkers N., Fini R., et al. (2019). Leveraging open innovation to improve society: past achievements and future trajectories. Wiley Online Library, 267–278.
-
- Albuquerque EdM. National systems of innovation and non-OECD countries: Notes about a rudimentary and tentative ‘typology’. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy. 1999;19(4):76. doi: 10.1590/0101-31571999-1089. - DOI
-
- Almirall E, Casadesus-Masanell R. Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Academy of Management Review. 2010;35(1):27–47. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577790. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources