Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;26(10):2120-2140.
doi: 10.1002/ejp.2024. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

Status quo of pain-related patient-reported outcomes and perioperative pain management in 10,415 patients from 10 countries: Analysis of registry data

PAIN OUT Research Group Jena; Chinese PAIN OUT network; Dutch PAIN OUT network; Méxican PAIN OUT network; Serbian PAIN OUT network; Spanish PAIN OUT network; French PAIN OUT network; Italian PAIN OUT network; Swiss PAIN OUT network; Irish PAIN OUT network; Belgian PAIN OUT network; Ruth Zaslansky  1
Collaborators, Affiliations

Status quo of pain-related patient-reported outcomes and perioperative pain management in 10,415 patients from 10 countries: Analysis of registry data

PAIN OUT Research Group Jena et al. Eur J Pain. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain is common at the global level, despite considerable attempts for improvement, reflecting the complexity of offering effective pain relief. In this study, clinicians from Mexico, China, and eight European countries evaluated perioperative pain practices and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in their hospitals as a basis for carrying out quality improvement (QI) projects in each country.

Methods: PAIN OUT, an international perioperative pain registry, provided standardized methodology for assessing management and multi-dimensional PROs on the first postoperative day, in patients undergoing orthopaedic, general surgery, obstetric & gynaecology or urological procedures.

Results: Between 2017 and 2019, data obtained from 10,415 adult patients in 105 wards, qualified for analysis. At the ward level: 50% (median) of patients reported worst pain intensities ≥7/10 NRS, 25% spent ≥50% of the time in severe pain and 20-34% reported severe ratings for pain-related functional and emotional interference. Demographic variables, country and surgical discipline explained a small proportion of the variation in the PROs, leaving about 88% unexplained. Most treatment processes varied considerably between wards. Ward effects accounted for about 7% and 32% of variation in PROs and treatment processes, respectively.

Conclusions: This comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that many patients in this international cohort reported poor pain-related PROs on the first postoperative day. PROs and treatments varied greatly. Most of the variance of the PROs could not be explained. The findings served as a basis for devising and implementing QI programmes in participating hospitals.

Significance: In preparation for quality improvement projects, we comprehensively evaluated pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and treatment practices of 10,415 adult patients spanning 10 countries. PROs were generally poor. Demographics, country and surgical discipline explained a small proportion of variation for the PROs, about 88% remained unexplained. Treatment practices varied considerably between wards. Ward effects accounted for about 7% and 32% of variation in PROs and treatment processes, respectively. Future studies will aim to identify treatments which are associated with improved outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abdel Shaheed, C., Ferreira, G. E., Dmitritchenko, A., McLachlan, A. J., Day, R. O., Saragiotto, B., Lin, C., Langendyk, V., Stanaway, F., Latimer, J., Kamper, S., McLachlan, H., Ahedi, H., & Maher, C. G. (2021). The efficacy and safety of paracetamol for pain relief: An overview of systematic reviews. The Medical Journal of Australia, 214(7), 324-331. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50992
    1. Alexander, J. C., Patel, B., & Joshi, G. P. (2019). Perioperative use of opioids: Current controversies and concerns. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Anaesthesiology, 33(3), 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.009
    1. Benchimol, E. I., Smeeth, L., Guttmann, A., Harron, K., Moher, D., Petersen, I., Sørensen, H. T., von Elm, E., Langan, S. M., RECORD Working Committee. (2015). The REporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Medicine, 12(10), e1001885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885
    1. Brady, B., Veljanova, I., & Chipchase, L. (2016). Are multidisciplinary interventions multicultural? A topical review of the pain literature as it relates to culturally diverse patient groups. Pain, 157(2), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000412
    1. Brennan, F., Carr, D. B., & Cousins, M. (2007). Pain management: A fundamental human right. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 105(1), 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000268145.52345.55