Split liver transplantation with extended right grafts on adult recipients: A propensity score matching analysis
- PMID: 35997030
- DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14801
Split liver transplantation with extended right grafts on adult recipients: A propensity score matching analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Split liver transplantation (SLT) emerged due to its potential to contribute to the organ pool and reduce organ shortage. However, SLT is technically challenging and has been associated with higher rates of postoperative complications leading to concerns about graft and patient survival. Moreover, there are few studies on matched-pair adult recipients of SLT and whole-liver transplant (WLT), with conflicting results.
Methods: This retrospective study analyze outcomes among adults who underwent SLT at our institution from 2010 to 2019. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed based on important donor and recipient variables. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between groups. Actuarial graft and patient survival were analyzed by KM curves.
Results: Out of 592 adults receiving a LT in our institution, 21 SLT adult recipients were identified and matched with 21 adults undergoing WLT. As expected donor age was significantly lower in SLT recipients (16 (15-22) vs. 32 (17-47), P = .012). Additional donor characteristics, including anthropometrics, and ischemic times were similar between groups. Baseline recipient characteristics and postoperative outcomes, including length of stay, vascular complications, biliary complications, and re-transplantation were comparable between SLT and WLT recipients. Graft (95/95/95 vs. 100/94/94, P = .98) and patient (100/100/100 vs. 100/94/94, P = .30) survival at 1-, 3-, 5-years, were similar between the SLT- and WLT group, respectively.
Conclusion: Split liver transplantation has the potential to increase the availability of organs for adult recipients without compromising individual outcomes.
Keywords: graft survival; outcomes; split liver transplantation.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kim TW, Roberts J, Strudler A, Tayur S. Ethics of split liver transplantation: should a large liver always be split if medically safe? J Med Ethics. 2021;medethics-2021-107400. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107400
-
- Pichlmayr R, Ringe B, Gubernatis G, Hauss JBH. Transplantation of a donor liver to 2 recipients (splitting transplantation)-a new method in the further development of segmental liver transplantation. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1988;373(2):127-130.
-
- Miller E, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)Liver and Intestinal Transplantation Committee. Public Comment Proposal. Jan 22, 2019; Richmond, VA, USA. Accessed January 02, 2022. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/media/2804/liver_publiccomment_20190122...
-
- Kwong AJ, Kim WR, Lake JR, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2019 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2021;21(2):208-315.
-
- Perito ER, Roll G, Dodge JL, Rhee S, Roberts JP. Split liver transplantation and pediatric waitlist mortality in the united states: potential for improvement. Transplantation. 2019;103(3):552-557.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials