Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul-Aug;16(4):15579883221115594.
doi: 10.1177/15579883221115594.

Nonresident Fathers' Voice: Marginalized, Disempowered, and Silenced

Affiliations

Nonresident Fathers' Voice: Marginalized, Disempowered, and Silenced

Dominic Violi et al. Am J Mens Health. 2022 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Nonresident fathers, following separation/divorce, are more likely to experience multiple forms of family types simultaneously than any other sociodemographic group. Although there is considerable writing on the factors and issues surrounding nonresident fathers from academics, the Family court, the Child Support Agency, and women's and welfare groups, the voice of nonresident fathers themselves is rarely heard. This is due to nonresident fathers being marginalized, disempowered, and silenced by these same entities. The voice of nonresident fathers is routinely minimized, dismissed, and labeled as anti-feminist or a backlash to feminism. This opinion piece argues that there is a need for qualitative research to be undertaken to investigate, document, and explore nonresident fathers' voices from their own perspective to hear what they have to say of themselves so that a better understanding of the dynamics that impact and influence them can be achieved. This would mean that actions can be identified and undertaken to better understand nonresident fathers' situation while providing insights for the development of social policies by Government and Welfare agencies together with support care for nonresident fathers highlighting their desires and needs.

Keywords: Fathers’ Rights Groups; children; disempowerment; divorce; fathers; gender; grief; intimate partner violence; marginalization; maternal gatekeeping; nonresident fathers; silencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Boyd S. B. (2004). Demonizing mothers: Fathers’ rights discourses in child custody law reform processes. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement, 6(1), 52–74. https://jarm.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jarm/article/view/4884
    1. Boyd S. B. (2010). Autonomy for mothers? Relational theory and parenting apart. Feminist Legal Studies, 18(2), 137–158. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10691-010-9152-3 - DOI
    1. Bradford R. (2020). Loneliness, impaired well-being, and partner abuse victimisation of separated fathers in Wales. Psychreg Journal of Psychology 4(3). 10.5281/zenodo.4296565 - DOI
    1. Brüggmann D. (2020). Work disability and divorce. In Kreyenfeld M., Trappe H. (Eds.), Life course research and social policies: Vol. 12. Parental life courses after separation and divorce in Europe (pp. 289–308). 10.1007/978-3-030-44575-1-14 - DOI
    1. Cohen-Israeli L., Remennick L. (2015). “As a divorcee, I am a better father”: Work and parenting among divorced men in Israel. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 56(7), 535–550. 10.1080/10502556.2015.1080083 - DOI