Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):66-72.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005608. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond

Affiliations
Review

Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond

Tanya L Zakrison et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this review was to review the ethical and multidisciplinary clinical challenges facing trauma surgeons when resuscitating patients presenting with penetrating brain injury (PBI) and multicavitary trauma.

Background: While there is a significant gap in the literature on managing PBI in patients presenting with multisystem trauma, recent data demonstrate that resuscitation and prognostic features for such patients remains poorly described, with trauma guidelines out of date in this field.

Methods: We reviewed a combination of recent multidisciplinary evidence-informed guidelines for PBI and coupled this with expert opinion from trauma, neurosurgery, neurocritical care, pediatric and transplant surgery, surgical ethics and importantly our community partners.

Results: Traditional prognostic signs utilized in traumatic brain injury may not be applicable to PBI with a multidisciplinary team approach suggested on a case-by-case basis. Even with no role for neurosurgical intervention, neurocritical care, and neurointerventional support may be warranted, in parallel to multicavitary operative intervention. Special considerations should be afforded for pediatric PBI. Ethical considerations center on providing the patient with the best chance of survival. Consideration of organ donation should be considered as part of the continuum of patient, proxy and family-centric support and care. Community input is crucial in guiding decision making or protocol establishment on an institutional level.

Conclusions: Support of the patient after multicavitary PBI can be complex and is best addressed in a multidisciplinary fashion with extensive community involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Lazaridis C, Mansour A, Alvarado-Dyer R, et al. . Civilian firearm-inflicted brain injury: coagulopathy, vascular injuries, and triage. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021;21:47–54. - PubMed
    1. Stories of Hope: Christopher. 2019. Available at: https://currents.neurocriticalcare.org/blogs/currents-editor/2019/12/05/....
    1. Lin DJ, Lam FC, Siracuse JJ, et al. . “Time is brain” the Gifford factor—or: why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:98–110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skarupa DJ, Khan M, Hsu A, et al. . Trends in civilian penetrating brain injury: a review of 26,871 patients. Am J Surg. 2019;218:255–260. - PubMed
    1. Joseph B, Aziz H, Pandit V, et al. . Improving survival rates after civilian gunshot wounds to the brain. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:58–65. - PubMed