Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 16;6(3):24.
doi: 10.3390/epigenomes6030024.

Experimental and Computational Approaches for Non-CpG Methylation Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Experimental and Computational Approaches for Non-CpG Methylation Analysis

Deepa Ramasamy et al. Epigenomes. .

Abstract

Cytosine methylation adjacent to adenine, thymine, and cytosine residues but not guanine of the DNA is distinctively known as non-CpG methylation. This CA/CT/CC methylation accounts for 15% of the total cytosine methylation and varies among different cell and tissue types. The abundance of CpG methylation has largely concealed the role of non-CpG methylation. Limitations in the early detection methods could not distinguish CpG methylation from non-CpG methylation. Recent advancements in enrichment strategies and high throughput sequencing technologies have enabled the detection of non-CpG methylation. This review discusses the advanced experimental and computational approaches to detect and describe the genomic distribution and function of non-CpG methylation. We present different approaches such as enzyme-based and antibody-based enrichment, which, when coupled, can also improve the sensitivity and specificity of non-CpG detection. We also describe the current bioinformatics pipelines and their specific application in computing and visualizing the imbalance of CpG and non-CpG methylation. Enrichment modes and the computational suites need to be further developed to ease the challenges of understanding the functional role of non-CpG methylation.

Keywords: computational approaches; mCpH; methods; non-CpG methylation; techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrichment strategies that are involved in non-CpG methylation detection and analysis. (A) Enzyme-based enrichment techniques: Enzyme-based enrichment approaches are classified based on the methylation-sensitive and -insensitive restriction enzymes. The targeted endonuclease activity eliminates CpG methylation and enriches non-CpG methylation that can be deduced by other methods such as semi-quantitative PCR, luminescence, quantitative PCR, and also read through Sanger sequencing. (B) Antibody-based enrichment techniques: Antibody-based enrichment strategies exploit the use of 5-methylcytidine antibodies that are specific to 5-mC to capture the methylated cytosines irrespective of their adjacent moiety. The captured methylated cytosines have both CpG and non-CpG methylation. Algorithmic filtering should be employed to the reads that are obtained from sequencing to differentiate non-CpG methylation from CpG methylation. Also, methods such as semi-quantitative PCR, luminescence, quantitative PCR, and Sanger sequencing can be used to detect non-CpG methylation post-enrichment for global scale non-CpG detection. (C) Single-molecule real-time sequencing: The recent development of single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing detects non-CpG methylation at single-base resolution without any enrichment techniques. Coupling SMRT with an algorithm that is specific for non-CpG methylation helps in detecting the CA/CT/CC methylation from CG methylation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Computational approaches that are involved in non-CpG methylation analysis. DNA methylation analysis uses a computational pipeline to distinguish between non-CpG methylation and CpG methylation. There are three major bioconductor packages such as Methyl Kit, Methyl Pipe, and DMR caller that could identify non-CpG methylation with different types of factors such as input sequence (SAM/txt/tab-limited), different aligners (BS-Specific/general), and various base-calling strategies. All of these factors help in distinguishing non-CpG methylation with multiple advantages.

References

    1. Moore L.D., Le T., Fan G. DNA Methylation and Its Basic Function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:23–38. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones P.A., Takai D. The Role of DNA Methylation in Mammalian Epigenetics. Science. 2001;293:1068–1070. doi: 10.1126/science.1063852. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziller M.J., Müller F., Liao J., Zhang Y., Gu H., Bock C., Boyle P., Epstein C.B., Bernstein B.E., Lengauer T., et al. Genomic Distribution and Inter-Sample Variation of Non-CpG Methylation across Human Cell Types. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramasamy D., Deva Magendhra Rao A.K., Rajkumar T., Mani S. Non-CpG Methylation—A Key Epigenetic Modification in Cancer. Brief. Funct. Genomics. 2021;20:304–311. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elab035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuso A. Non-CpG Methylation Revised. Epigenomes. 2018;2:22. doi: 10.3390/epigenomes2040022. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources