Sniffing of Body Odors and Individual Significance of Olfaction Are Associated with Sexual Desire: A Cross-Cultural Study in China, India, and the USA
- PMID: 35997908
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02398-1
Sniffing of Body Odors and Individual Significance of Olfaction Are Associated with Sexual Desire: A Cross-Cultural Study in China, India, and the USA
Abstract
Olfactory sensations contribute to sexual desire and sexual behavior. However, the degree to which individual importance of olfactory function and body odors relate to sexual desire is not known. This study was conducted to preliminarily examine these relationships among Chinese college students (N = 1903) via the Importance of Olfaction Questionnaire, the Body Odor Sniffing Questionnaire, and the Sexual Desire Inventory, which were used to measure subjective significance of olfaction, frequency of sniffing self or others, and sexual desire, respectively. Individuals who assigned higher importance to olfaction or engaged more in body odor sniffing showed stronger sexual desire. We further explored these associations in different cultures to determine whether cultural consistency existed. We conducted a second study to make cross-cultural comparisons between Indian (N = 313) and US (N = 249) populations. For both countries, a higher importance placed on olfaction and a higher prevalence of body odor sniffing were consistently associated with stronger sexual desire. In conclusion, our study confirmed that people who placed more value on olfactory function or engaged more in body odor sniffing showed stronger sexual desire. These correlations were consistent for both sexes and across different cultures, further indicating the importance of olfaction in sexuality.
Keywords: Body odor; Sexual desire; Smell; Social chemosignaling; Subjective significance.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Do you often sniff yourself or others? Development of the Body Odor Sniffing Questionnaire and a cross-cultural survey in China and the USA.Physiol Behav. 2022 Oct 15;255:113934. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113934. Epub 2022 Jul 28. Physiol Behav. 2022. PMID: 35908610
-
Cattle olfaction: Dairy cows' interest in odors and factors affecting their odor exploration behavior.J Dairy Sci. 2025 Jun;108(6):6297-6312. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-26119. Epub 2025 Apr 16. J Dairy Sci. 2025. PMID: 40250611
-
Olfactory sensitivity and sexual desire in young adult and elderly men: an introductory investigation.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):157-61. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3879. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013. PMID: 23710949
-
Is It Possible to Predict the Odor of a Molecule on the Basis of its Structure?Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 20;20(12):3018. doi: 10.3390/ijms20123018. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31226833 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What Makes a Better Smeller?Perception. 2017 Mar-Apr;46(3-4):406-430. doi: 10.1177/0301006616688224. Epub 2017 Jan 19. Perception. 2017. PMID: 28103755 Review.
Cited by
-
What emotions are elicited by smells in Japanese people? Emotional measurement using a universal scale in Japanese.PLoS One. 2025 May 13;20(5):e0323206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323206. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40359465 Free PMC article.
-
The Scent of Intimacy: Exploring the Associations Between Intimacy, Disgust, and Olfactory Ability.Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Jun;54(6):2107-2116. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03145-y. Epub 2025 May 27. Arch Sex Behav. 2025. PMID: 40425945 Free PMC article.
-
The scent of mating strategy: sociosexual orientation was associated with olfaction and body odor sniffing behavior in Chinese and American populations.BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;13(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03134-9. BMC Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40696446 Free PMC article.
-
Test-retest reliability and validity of the Importance of Olfaction Questionnaire in Denmark.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0269211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269211. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38241356 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bartneck, C., Duenser, A., Moltchanova, E., & Zawieska, K. (2015). Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0121595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121595 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 242–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5 - DOI
-
- Bendas, J., Hummel, T., & Croy, I. (2018). Olfactory function relates to sexual experience in adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(5), 1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1203-x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Blaustein, A. R. (1981). Sexual selection and mammalian olfaction. The American Naturalist, 117(6), 1006–1010. https://doi.org/10.1086/283786 - DOI
-
- Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources