Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Apr;37(2):689-698.
doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00903-4. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

Intraoperative transabdominal MEPs: four case reports

David W Allison  1 , Miranda K Hayworth  2 , Remi Nader  2 , Melodie Ballman  3 , Derrick Sun  4 , Rony Ninan  5 , Edward Southern  6
Affiliations
Case Reports

Intraoperative transabdominal MEPs: four case reports

David W Allison et al. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Four recent cases utilizing transabdominal motor-evoked potentials (TaMEPs) are presented as illustrative of the monitoring technique during lumbosacral fusion, sciatic nerve tumor resection, cauda equina tumor resection, and lumbar decompression. Case 1: In a high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis revision fusion, both transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) and TaMEPs detected a transient focal loss of left tibialis anterior response in conjunction with L5 nerve root decompression. Case 2: In a sciatic nerve tumor resection, TcMEPs responses were lost but TaMEPs remained unchanged, the patient was neurologically intact postoperatively. Case 3: TaMEPs were acquired during an L1-L3 intradural extramedullary cauda equina tumor resection utilizing a unique TaMEP stimulation electrode. Case 4: TaMEPs were successfully acquired with little anesthetic fade utilizing an anesthetic regimen of 1.1 MAC Sevoflurane during a lumbar decompression. While the first two cases present TaMEPs and TcMEPs side-by-side, demonstrating TaMEPs correlating to TcMEPs (Case 1) or a more accurate reflection of patient outcome (Case 2), no inference regarding the accuracy of TaMEPs to monitor nerve elements during cauda equina surgery (Cases 3) or the lumbar decompression presented in Case 4 should be made as these are demonstrations of technique, not utility.

Keywords: IONM; Lumbosacral; TaMEP; TcMEP; Transabdominal motor evoked potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tamkus A, Rice KS, Hoffman G. Transcranial motor evoked potential alarm criteria to predict foot drop injury during lumbosacral surgery. Spine. 2018;43(4):E227–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002288 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilent WB, et al. Utility of motor evoked potentials to diagnose and reduce lower extremity motor nerve root injuries during 4386 extradural posterior lumbosacral spine procedures. Spine J. 2020;20(2):191–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.08.013 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilent WB, Trott JM, Sestokas AK. Roadmap for motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring for patients undergoing lumbar and lumbosacral spinal fusion procedures. Neurodiagn J. 2021;61(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2021.1866934 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tamkus AA, Rice KS, Kim HL. Differential rates of false-positive findings in transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring when using inhalational anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia during spine surgeries. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1440–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.037 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mandeville RM, et al. Use of posterior root-muscle reflexes in peripheral nerve surgery: a case report. Neurodiagn J. 2016;56(3):178–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2016.1202723 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources