Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;80(1):43-52.
doi: 10.1177/10775587221118157. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

Employee Engagement in Quality Improvement and Patient Sociodemographic Characteristics in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Affiliations

Employee Engagement in Quality Improvement and Patient Sociodemographic Characteristics in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Olivia S Jung et al. Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Quality improvement (QI) work is critical, particularly in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) that treat underserved populations. In a national sample of 45 FQHCs, we examined how patients' sociodemographic characteristics were associated with employee engagement in QI, via innovation contests that solicited ideas for improving care and offered opportunities to vote on ideas. We posited that patients' sociodemographic characteristics influence the complexity and intensity of clinical work and thus employees' capacity to engage in QI. Regression results indicated that the percentage of patients living in poverty was negatively associated with employee participation in idea submission and voting. Moreover, the percentage of Hispanic patients was negatively associated with participation in voting. The percentage of Black patients, however, was not associated with either outcome. FQHCs that serve a higher share of low income and/or Hispanic patients may face resource and personnel constraints that reduce employees' capacity to contribute to QI efforts.

Keywords: community health centers; federally qualified health centers; innovation contests; quality improvement; underserved populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adamczyk S., Bullinger A. C., Möslein K. M. (2012). Innovation contests: A review, classification and outlook. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(4), 335–360.
    1. Blasco A., Jung O. S., Lakhani K. R., Menietti M. (2019). Incentives for public goods inside organizations: Field experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 160, 214–229.
    1. Bor J., Cohen G. H., Galea S. (2017). Population health in an era of rising income inequality: USA, 1980–2015. The Lancet, 389(10077), 1475–1490. - PubMed
    1. Casalino L. P., Ramsay P., Baker L. C., Pesko M. F., Shortell S. M. (2018). Medical group characteristics and the cost and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Services Research, 53(6), 4970–4996. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cole M. B., Kim J.-H., Levengood T. W., Trivedi A. N. (2021). Association of Medicaid expansion with 5-year changes in hypertension and diabetes outcomes at federally qualified health centers. JAMA Health Forum, 2(9), Article e212375. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types