Impact of family history on clinicopathological variables and disease progression in Japanese prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 36000706
- DOI: 10.1111/iju.14990
Impact of family history on clinicopathological variables and disease progression in Japanese prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated whether a first-degree family history (FH) of prostate cancer (PCa) in Japanese patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) is correlated with clinicopathological variables and disease progression.
Methods: We reviewed consecutive 392 localized PCa patients undergoing robotic-assisted RP at our institution between 2015 and 2020. Information on FH was obtained via a self-administered questionnaire. A positive FH was defined as having a first-degree FH: a father and/or one or more brothers with PCa prior to diagnosis. All patients had clinically localized PCa treated by robotic-assisted RP. We evaluated the relationship between clinical characteristics, pathological findings, and biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) according to first-degree FH status.
Results: Median follow-up was 20.8 months. FH was identified in 42 (10.7%) patients. Patients in the FH group (median, 64.8 years) were diagnosed at a significantly younger age than patients in the non-FH (NFH) group (patients without FH) (median, 67.7 years) (p = 0.003). The 5-year bPFS in the FH and NFH groups was 72.0% and 78.1%, respectively (p = 0.90). A subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density between the FH group (median, 0.51 ng/ml/cm3 ) and the NFH group (median, 0.29 ng/ml/cm3 ) in patients younger than 60 years (p = 0.033).
Conclusions: In this RP population, FH of PCa was not associated with worse clinical characteristics, pathological findings, or disease progression. Patients with a FH underwent surgery at a significantly younger age, and among patients <60 years, patients with a FH had significantly higher PSA density compared with patients without a FH.
Keywords: family history; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy.
© 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment from Dr. Urabe to Impact of family history on clinicopathological variables and disease progression in Japanese prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.Int J Urol. 2022 Nov;29(11):1346-1347. doi: 10.1111/iju.15011. Epub 2022 Aug 24. Int J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36001300 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment from Dr Yadav and Dr Kumar to Impact of family history on clinicopathological variables and disease progression in Japanese prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.Int J Urol. 2022 Nov;29(11):1347-1348. doi: 10.1111/iju.15032. Epub 2022 Sep 12. Int J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36095250 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Positive family history of prostate cancer not associated with worse outcomes after radical prostatectomy.Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.005. Urology. 2005. PMID: 15708044
-
Men with family history of prostate cancer have a higher risk of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2122-5. Epub 2017 Nov 21. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29164326
-
Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients.Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jun 26. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 26119559
-
Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09730.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 20942833
-
Clinicopathological characteristics of localized prostate cancer in younger men aged ≤ 50 years treated with radical prostatectomy in the PSA era: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(18):6473-6484. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3320. Epub 2020 Jul 22. Cancer Med. 2020. PMID: 32697048 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Histopathological results of radical prostatectomy specimen of men younger than 50 years of age at the time of surgery: possible implications for prostate cancer screening programs?World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):421-425. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04287-1. Epub 2023 Jan 19. World J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36656332 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Johns LE, Houlston RS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial prostate cancer risk. BJU Int. 2003;91:789-94.
-
- Albright F, Stephenson RA, Agarwal N, Teerlink CC, Lowrance WT, Farnham JM, et al. Prostate cancer risk prediction based on complete prostate cancer family history. Prostate. 2015;75:390-8.
-
- Carter BS, Bova GS, Beaty TH, Steinberg GD, Childs B, Isaacs WB, et al. Hereditary prostate cancer: epidemiologic and clinical features. J Urol. 1993;150:797-802.
-
- Bauer JJ, Srivastava S, Connelly RR, Sesterhenn IA, Preston DM, McLeod DG, et al. Significance of familial history of prostate cancer to traditional prognostic variables, genetic biomarkers, and recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 1998;51:970-6.
-
- Azzouzi AR, Valeri A, Cormier L, Fournier G, Mangin P, Cussenot O. Familial prostate cancer cases before and after radical prostatectomy do not show any aggressiveness compared with sporadic cases. Urology. 2003;61:1193-7.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous