Speech Symptoms of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and the Incidence of Secondary Speech Surgery in 10-Year-Old Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Comparison of 2 Randomized Surgical Methods for Primary Palatal Surgery
- PMID: 36000743
- DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008926
Speech Symptoms of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and the Incidence of Secondary Speech Surgery in 10-Year-Old Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Comparison of 2 Randomized Surgical Methods for Primary Palatal Surgery
Abstract
Objective: To compare speech symptoms of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and incidence of secondary speech surgery in 10-year-old Finnish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) following primary palatal surgery using 2 surgical methods.
Design: Single center analysis within the Scandcleft multicenter randomized controlled trial of primary surgery for UCLP.
Materials and methods: Patients comprised 79 nonsyndromic 10-year-old children with UCLP. Two randomized surgical methods were used in the primary palatal surgery: soft palate closure at 4 months and hard palate closure at 12 months (Arm A) and closure of both the soft and hard palate at 12 months (Arm C). Speech symptoms of VPI were analyzed from standardized video recordings by 2 experienced speech pathologists. The incidences of surgery for correcting VPI, fistula closure, and speech therapy were evaluated retrospectively from patient records.
Results: No differences in speech symptoms of VPI, need for VPI surgery or speech therapy were found between the surgical methods. Of all 79 children, 33% had had VPI surgery and 61% had speech therapy. The number of fistulas was significantly higher in Arm A (25%) than in Arm C (2%). Moderate to severe speech symptoms of VPI (hypernasality, continuous nasal air leakage, weak pressure consonants, and/or compensatory articulation) were found in 11% of the children.
Conclusion: No differences were present between groups in speech symptoms of VPI or need for VPI surgery or speech therapy between the 2 surgical methods. One third of the children had undergone VPI surgery. Most of the children (89%) had good or relatively good speech.
Copyright © 2022 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Speech proficiency at 10 years of age.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 May;58(3):892-909. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12830. Epub 2022 Dec 21. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023. PMID: 36541222
-
Speech Outcomes After Primary Palatoplasty and Presurgical Cleft Characteristics: Is There a Predictive Association?J Craniofac Surg. 2025 May 1;36(3):862-865. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010744. Epub 2024 Oct 17. J Craniofac Surg. 2025. PMID: 39633579
-
Speech Outcomes of Buccal Myomucosal Flap Palatal Lengthening for Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Apr;62(4):545-557. doi: 10.1177/10556656231216834. Epub 2023 Nov 22. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025. PMID: 37993983
-
Posterior pillar augmentation palatoplasty (PPAP+Re:IVVP): outcome of a modified procedure for VPI.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 Aug;53(8):1070-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.04.002. Epub 2025 Apr 14. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40234109
-
How differences in anatomy and physiology and other aetiology affect the way we label and describe speech in individuals with cleft lip and palate.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2181-2196. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12946. Epub 2023 Aug 31. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024. PMID: 37650488 Review.
Cited by
-
Two-stage palatal repair in non-syndromic CLP patients using anterior to posterior closure is associated with minimal need for secondary palatal surgery.Head Face Med. 2024 Mar 9;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00418-0. Head Face Med. 2024. PMID: 38461271 Free PMC article.
-
Speech correcting surgery after primary palatoplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 29;28(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05391-7. Clin Oral Investig. 2023. PMID: 38157017
References
-
- Harding A, Grunwell P. Characteristics of cleft palate speech. Eur J Disord Commun 1996;31:331–357
-
- Hutters B, Brøndsted K. Strategies in cleft palate speech with special reference to Danish. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:126–136
-
- Henningsson G, Isberg A. A cineradiographic study of velopharyngeal movements for deviant versus nondeviant articulation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:115–117
-
- Harding A, Grunwell P. Active versus passive cleft-type speech characteristics. Int J Lang Commun Disord 1998;33:329–352
-
- Kummer AW. Speech therapy for errors secondary to cleft and velopharyngeal dysfunction. Semin Speech Lang 2011;32:191–198
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical