The 12-Month Effects of the Trauma Collaborative Care Intervention: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 36000769
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00475
The 12-Month Effects of the Trauma Collaborative Care Intervention: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Studies have suggested that patient-centered collaborative care in the early phases of recovery may assist providers and patients in managing the multifactorial consequences of injury and may lead to better outcomes. This cluster-controlled trial, conducted at 12 U.S. Level-I trauma centers, was designed to evaluate the impact of the Trauma Collaborative Care (TCC) program on 1-year outcomes following severe musculoskeletal injury.
Methods: Patients with high-energy orthopaedic trauma requiring surgical fixation were prospectively enrolled. Six sites implemented the TCC intervention as well as the Trauma Survivors Network (TSN), and the other 6 sites provided the standard of care. Participants were followed for 1 year, and a composite primary outcome measure composed of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) Dysfunction Index, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) was assessed. A 2-stage, Bayesian hierarchical statistical procedure was used to characterize treatment effects. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for an error in the delivery of the intervention.
Results: There were 378 patients enrolled at 6 trauma centers implementing the TCC program, and 344 patients enrolled at 6 trauma centers providing usual care. Patient utilization of treatment components varied across the intervention sites: 29% of patients in the intervention group received all 5 key components (TSN handbook education, peer visits, recovery assessment, and calls before and after recovery assessment). Posterior estimates of the intention-to-treat effect suggested that the intervention did not have an appreciable effect: the odds of the composite outcome for the TCC group increased by 5% (95% credible interval, -40% to 63%). The estimates of the effect of receiving all 5 key intervention components were similar.
Conclusions: Despite prior work showing early positive effects, this analysis suggests that the TCC program as delivered did not have positive effects on patient outcomes at 1 year. It is not known whether programs that improve compliance or target specific subgroups would better meet the psychosocial needs of trauma survivors.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H202 ).
References
-
- Finkelstein E, Corso PS, Miller TR. The incidence and economic burden of injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford; Oxford University Press; 2006.
-
- Alghnam S, Wegener ST, Bhalla K, Colantuoni E, Castillo R. Long-term outcomes of individuals injured in motor vehicle crashes: a population-based study. Injury. 2015 Aug;46(8):1503-8.
-
- Halcomb E, Daly J, Davidson P, Elliott D, Griffiths R. Life beyond severe traumatic injury: an integrative review of the literature. Aust Crit Care. 2005 Feb;18(1):17-8: 20-4.
-
- Marshall GN, Miles JN, Stewart SH. Anxiety sensitivity and PTSD symptom severity are reciprocally related: evidence from a longitudinal study of physical trauma survivors. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Feb;119(1):143-50.
-
- Archer KR, Abraham CM, Obremskey WT. Psychosocial factors predict pain and physical health after lower extremity trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3519-26.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
