Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 1;21(1):254-263.
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00434.

Behavioral pain indicators for adults with an intellectual disability: a scoping review protocol

Morgane Gilliand  1   2 , Béatrice Perrenoud  3   4   5 , Thierry Lecerf  6 , Magali Serex  2 , Anne Breaud  2 , Philip Larkin  1   4
Affiliations

Behavioral pain indicators for adults with an intellectual disability: a scoping review protocol

Morgane Gilliand et al. JBI Evid Synth. .

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aims to identify and map the behavioral pain indicators observed when adults with an intellectual disability experience pain.

Introduction: Adults with an intellectual disability have more health problems than the general population. The likelihood that this population will experience pain is high, but intellectual disability can obstruct the verbal expression of pain. Adults with an intellectual disability express pain via behavioral pain indicators; however, because no behavioral pain scale exists for this population, observers may misinterpret the pain experienced by adults with an intellectual disability.

Inclusion criteria: The review will examine literature about behavioral pain indicators for adults with any type of intellectual disability who are suffering from any type of pain in any country or care setting.

Methods: The review will be conducted according to the JBI recommendations for scoping reviews. A preliminary search focusing on the concepts of intellectual disability and pain measurement was conducted for PubMed and CINAHL in March 2022. Once the protocol is validated, searches will also be carried out in Embase, JBI EBP Database, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, ERIC, Google Scholar, MedNar, and the websites of relevant professional associations. Titles and abstracts, and then full-text studies, will be selected independently by 2 researchers and assessed against the inclusion criteria. Relevant information will be imported into a data chart. Any behavioral pain indicators identified will be classified into 14 behavioral categories.

Review registration number: Open Science Framework osf.io/8xckf.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Schalock RL, Luckasson R, Tassé MJ. Intellectual disability: definition, diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports. 12th edition. Silver Spring, MD: aaidd; 2021. 152 p. - PubMed
    1. Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, Dua T, Saxena S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil 2011;32(2):419–436. - PubMed
    1. Craig KD. Toward the social communication model of pain. In: Vervoort T, Karos K, Trost Z, Prkachin KM, editors. Social and interpersonal dynamics in pain [internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 9]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-78340-6_2. - DOI
    1. Defrin R, McGuire B. Pain in individuals with an intellectual disability: scope of the problem and assessment challenge. Washington, DC: International Association for the Study of Pain; 2019. 4 p.
    1. Herr K, Coyne PJ, McCaffery M, Manworren R, Merkel S. Pain assessment in the patient unable to self-report: position statement with clinical practice recommendations. Pain Manag Nurs 2011;12(4):230–250. - PubMed

Publication types