Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in PICU Settings: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 36000864
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003069
Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in PICU Settings: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objectives: Development of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is strategy for prevention and management of emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature on antimicrobial stewardship interventions in PICUs and analyzed approaches, structure, implementation, and outcomes of the ASPs.
Data sources: PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched for studies published from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020, reporting interventions on judicious use of antimicrobials in PICUs (last search performed February 28, 2021).
Data selection: Studies that evaluated an intervention in a PICU setting or both in PICU and other settings and reported separate results for PICU were eligible for full-text review. Studies that had implemented stewardship in the entire hospital, including the PICU, but without presenting dedicated PICU data were excluded from the analysis.
Data extraction: The strategy of intervention, structure of ASP team, implementation, and outcomes were assessed with a checklist tool for all studies included in the analysis. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias in Nonrandomized studies of Interventions tool.
Data synthesis: Thirteen articles were found: 11 that applied ASP in PICUs, and two at hospital level. All PICU-dedicated ASPs applied a multimodal intervention combining strategies simultaneously; audit with feedback (6/11) and facility-specific clinical practice guidelines (7/11) were the most common strategies. A multidisciplinary team was formulated in all ASPs except for three biomarker-based interventions. Six of 11 studies included techniques to enhance behavior change and one implemented a behavior-based intervention. Antibiotic consumption was evaluated in all ASPs, cost in three of 11, antibiotic resistance in one of 11, length of hospitalization in six of 11, and mortality in eight of 11. All hospital-wide ASPs used audit with feedback in addition to facility-specific clinical practice guidelines and assessed antimicrobial consumption, expenditures, length of stay, and mortality.
Conclusions: The prevalence of ASPs in PICUs is limited, and few programs follow all of the currently available recommendations.
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Brogan TV, Thurm C, Hersh AL, et al.: Variability in antibiotic use across PICUs. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018; 19:519–527
-
- Versporten A, Sharland M, Bielicki J, et al.; ARPEC Project Group Members: The antibiotic resistance and prescribing in European children project: A neonatal and pediatric antimicrobial web-based point prevalence survey in 73 hospitals worldwide. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013; 32:e242–e253
-
- Potocki M, Goette J, Szucs TD, et al.: Prospective survey of antibiotic utilization in pediatric hospitalized patients to identify targets for improvement of prescription. Infection. 2003; 31:398–403
-
- Goossens H, Ferech M, Vander Stichele R, et al.; ESAC Project Group: Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: A cross-national database study. Lancet. 2005; 365:579–587
-
- Amann S, Neef K, Kohl S: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019; 26:175–177
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
