Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;22(5):865-876.
doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01462-9. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

ClearSpeechTogether: a Rater Blinded, Single, Controlled Feasibility Study of Speech Intervention for People with Progressive Ataxia

Affiliations

ClearSpeechTogether: a Rater Blinded, Single, Controlled Feasibility Study of Speech Intervention for People with Progressive Ataxia

Anja Lowit et al. Cerebellum. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Progressive ataxias frequently lead to speech disorders and consequently impact on communication participation and psychosocial wellbeing. Whilst recent studies demonstrate the potential for improvements in these areas, these treatments generally require intensive input which can reduce acceptability of the approach. A new model of care-ClearSpeechTogether-is proposed which maximises treatment intensity whilst minimising demands on clinician. This study aimed to establish feasibility and accessibility of this approach and at the same time determine the potential benefits and adverse effects on people with progressive ataxias.

Method: This feasibility study targeted people with progressive ataxia and mild-moderate speech and gross motor impairment. ClearSpeechTogether consisted of four individual sessions over 2 weeks followed by 20 patient-led group sessions over 4 weeks. All sessions were provided online. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected for evaluation.

Results: Nine participants completed treatment. Feasibility and acceptability were high and no adverse effects were reported. Statistical tests found significantly reduced vocal strain, improved reading intelligibility and increased participation and confidence. Participant interviews highlighted the value of group support internalisation of speech strategies and psycho-social wellbeing.

Discussion: ClearSpeechTogether presented a feasible, acceptable intervention for a small cohort of people with progressive ataxia. It matched or exceeded the outcomes previously reported following individual therapy. Particularly notable was the fact that this could be achieved through patient led practice without the presence of a clinician. Pending confirmation of our results by larger, controlled trials, ClearSpeechTogether could represent an effective approach to manage speech problems in ataxia.

Keywords: Communication participation; Dysarthria; Group intervention; Intelligibility; Progressive ataxia; Speech therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reading Intelligibility across assessment session by speaker and group mean
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Communication Participation Item Bank (CPIB), maximum scores (no impact) = 30

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Folker JE, et al. Differentiating profiles of speech impairments in Friedreich's ataxia: a perceptual and instrumental approach. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47(1):65–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00078.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sidtis JJ, et al. Longitudinal cerebral blood flow changes during speech in hereditary ataxia. Brain Lang. 2010;114(1):43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schalling E, Hartelius L. Speech in spinocerebellar ataxia. Brain Lang. 2013;127(3):317–322. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duffy JR, Motor speech disorders - substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. 4th ed. 2019, St. Louis: Elsevier, Mosby.
    1. Folker J, et al. Dysarthria in Friedreich’s Ataxia: a perceptual analysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2010;62(3):97–103. doi: 10.1159/000287207. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources