The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement
- PMID: 36001280
- PMCID: PMC9807711
- DOI: 10.1007/s12471-022-01717-4
The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement
Abstract
Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).
Keywords: Consensus; Hypertension; Netherlands; Patient care; Sympathectomy.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
V.J.M. Zeijen received institutional grant/research support from ReCor Medical. J. Daemen received institutional grant/research support from Astra Zeneca, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, ACIST Medical, Medtronic, Microport, Pie Medical, and ReCor medical. A.A. Kroon, B.H. van den Born, P.J. Blankestijn, S.C.A. Meijvis, A. Nap, E. Lipsic, A. Elvan, J. Versmissen, R.J. van Geuns, M. Voskuil, P.A.L. Tonino, W. Spiering and J. Deinum declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures

References
-
- Thelen JKN, Finger J, von der Lippe Ryl EL. ECHIM pilot data collection, analyses and dissemination. Berlin: Robert Koch Institute; 2012.
-
- Ministerie van Volksgezondheid WeSV . NIVEL Zorgregistraties eerste lijn. 2020.
-
- Banegas JR, Lopez-Garcia E, Dallongeville J, Guallar E, Halcox JP, Borghi C, et al. Achievement of treatment goals for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice across Europe: the EURIKA study. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(17):2143–2152. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources