Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;60(10):2981-2993.
doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02649-2. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Fluid dynamic assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure in a tracheostomy tube connector during respiration

Affiliations

Fluid dynamic assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure in a tracheostomy tube connector during respiration

Shiori Kageyama et al. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

High-flow oxygen therapy using a tracheostomy tube is a promising clinical approach to reduce the work of breathing in tracheostomized patients. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is usually applied during oxygen inflow to improve oxygenation by preventing end-expiratory lung collapse. However, much is still unknown about the geometrical effects of PEEP, especially regarding tracheostomy tube connectors (or adapters). Quantifying the degree of end-expiratory pressure (EEP) that takes patient-specific spirometry into account would be useful in this regard, but no such framework has been established yet. Thus, a platform to assess PEEP under respiration was developed, wherein three-dimensional simulation of airflow in a tracheostomy tube connector is coupled with a lumped lung model. The numerical model successfully reflected the magnitude of EEP measured experimentally using a lung phantom. Numerical simulations were further performed to quantify the effects of geometrical parameters on PEEP, such as inlet angles and rate of stenosis in the connector. Although sharp inlet angles increased the magnitude of EEP, they cannot be expected to achieve clinically reasonable PEEP. On the other hand, geometrical constriction in the connector can potentially result in PEEP as obtained with conventional nasal cannulae.

Keywords: Computational biomechanics; Computational fluid dynamics; Lumped lung model; Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); Tracheostomy tube connector.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Computational domain for 3D CFD involving a modeled connector and schematics of a lumped lung model. b 3D CFD computational model with 50% stenosis, and c generated meshes where adaptive mesh refinement and prismatic layers lining the walls are considered in addition to a polyhedral mesh. The boundary conditions of the lumped lung model were set as inlet velocity Uin, outlet pressures Pout1 and Pout2, and outlet velocity Uout3 (= Utr (t, Pe, Pal, Ppl)). The standard inlet angle was set as θ = 60°. The inlet and outlet diameters in connectors were commonly set as Din = 11 mm and Dout = 15.4 mm. The rate of stenosis was defined using the minimum connector diameter Dmin as (1—Dmin/Din). The length of the constricted portion of each connector was set as 1 mm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart for updating the Dirichlet boundary condition Uout3 in 3D CFD, where α is the coefficient for the temporal updating of Uout3 (0 ≤ α ≤ 1), ε and t are set as ε = 0.01 and t = 3 T, respectively. The simulation ends at t = t = 3 T
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Snapshot of entire experimental setup and b schematic of experiment. c Time history of tracheal pressure Ptr in a normal connector (i.e., inlet angle θ = 60° without stenosis) at Qin = 30 L/min. d A comparison of EEP obtained with experimental measurements (blank triangles) versus numerical simulations (solid triangles) as a function of inlet flow rate Qin in a normal connector, where the errors in experimental data represent temporal fluctuations during the end-expiratory phase
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Time history of the pleural pressure Ppl, calculated alveoli pressure Pal, and tracheal pressure Ptr (= Pout3), where data are shown after Pal and Ptr have reached the stable periodic phase. Snapshots of b pressure and c velocity fields in a normal connector in each respiratory phase: (left) inspiration, (middle) expiration, and (right) the end of expiration defined with Utr = 0. Snapshots of streamlines in each phase are also displayed in c, where the color represents the velocity magnitude. The results were obtained with Qtr = 30 L/min
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a Time history of the tracheal velocity Utr and lung volume V during a period T (= 5 s) at Qin = 30 L/min. b The tidal volume ΔVtidal as a function of Qin. Data were obtained after reaching stable periodic behavior
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
EEP as a function of inlet flow rate Qin in a normal connector for different inlet angles θ
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
a Time histories of Ppl, Pal, and Ptr. Snapshots of b pressure and c velocity fields in each respiratory phase in a connector with 50% stenosis: (left) inspiration, (middle) expiration, and (right) end of expiration. The results were obtained with Qtr = 30 L/min
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
a Normalized EEP (left axis) and normalized tidal volume (right axis) by those obtained with a normal connector (0% stenosis) at Qin = 30 L/min as a function of the degree of stenosis. b Tidal volume ΔVtidal obtained with the connector with 50% stenosis as a function of Qin. The results of ΔVtidal in a normal connector, as shown in Fig. 5, is also displayed
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
EEP for different degrees of stenosis as a function of inlet flow rate Qin. EEP obtained with a normal connector, as shown in Fig. 6, is also displayed

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alzahranya M, Banerjeea A, Salzman G. The role of coupled resistance-compliance in upper tracheobronchial airways under high frequency oscillatory ventilation. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36:1593–1604. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.08.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;4:1301–1308. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbini P, Brighenti C, Gnudi G. A simulation study of expiratory flow limitation in obstructive patients during mechanical ventilation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:1879–1889. doi: 10.1007/s10439-006-9213-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bräunlich J, Beyer D, Mai D, Hammschmidt S, Seyfarth H-J, Wirtz H. Effects of nasal high flow on ventilation in volunteers, COPD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Respiration. 2013;85:319–325. doi: 10.1159/000342027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brouns M, Jayaraju ST, Lacor C, Mey JD, Noppen M, Vincken W, Verbanck S. Tracheal stenosis: a flow dynamics study. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103:1178–1184. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01063.2006. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources