Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 8:13:870956.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.870956. eCollection 2022.

Characteristics of unmanned aerial spraying systems and related spray drift: A review

Affiliations
Review

Characteristics of unmanned aerial spraying systems and related spray drift: A review

Pengchao Chen et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Although drift is not a new issue, it deserves further attention for Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS). The use of UASS as a spraying tool for Plant Protection Products is currently explored and applied worldwide. They boast different benefits such as reduced applicator exposure, high operating efficiency and are unconcerned by field-related constraints (ground slope, ground resistance). This review summarizes UASS characteristics, spray drift and the factors affecting UASS drift, and further research that still needs to be developed. The distinctive features of UASS comprise the existence of one or more rotors, relatively higher spraying altitude, faster-flying speed, and limited payload. This study highlights that due to most of these features, the drift of UASS may be inevitable. However, this drift could be effectively reduced by optimizing the structural layout of the rotor and spraying system, adjusting the operating parameters, and establishing a drift buffer zone. Further efforts are still necessary to better assess the drift characteristics of UASS, establish drift models from typical models, crops, and climate environments, and discuss standard methods for measuring UASS drift.

Keywords: downwash airflow; drift measurement; relative movement; spray drift; unmanned aerial spraying systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Examples of Hydraulic nozzles. (A) Hollow cone nozzle (TR80-02c, Lechler), (B) flat fan nozzle (HYPRO, 110-015), (C) air induction nozzle (IDK 120-01, Lechler).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Centrifugal nozzle (2018, XAG Co., Ltd).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The UASS spraying test bench in South China Agricultural University.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The relative position of the rotor and the nozzle. (A) Inside under the rotor (T30, from DJI), (B) below the rotor (extended, 3WWDZ-16, from Tuogong), (C) below the rotor (P30, from XAG), (D) boom (kongzhongbaoma, from SCAU).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The UASS with different numbers of rotors. (A) Eight-rotor UASS (MG-1P, from DJI), (B) quadrotor UASS (P30, from XAG), (C) six-rotor UASS (M45, from GKXN,China), (D) two-rotor UASS (V40, from XAG).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmad F., Zhang S., Qiu B., Ma J., Xin H., Qiu W., et al. (2022). Comparison of water sensitive paper and glass strip sampling approaches to access spray deposit by UAV sprayers. Agronomy 12:1302. 10.3390/agronomy12061302 - DOI
    1. Al Heidary M., Douzals J. P., Sinfort C., Vallet A. (2014). Influence of spray characteristics on potential spray drift of field crop sprayers: a literature review. Crop Prot. 63 120–130. 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.05.006 - DOI
    1. ASAE ANSI/ASABE (2020). Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. Standard 572.3. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
    1. Balsari P., Grella M., Marucco P., Matta F., Miranda Fuentes A. (2019). Assessing the influence of air speed and liquid flow rate on the droplet size and homogeneity in pneumatic spraying. Pest. Manag. Sci. 75 366–379. 10.1002/ps.5120 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartzanas T., Kacira M., Zhu H., Karmakar S., Tamimi E., Katsoulas N., et al. (2013). Computational fluid dynamics applications to improve crop production systems. Comput. Electron. Agric. 93 151–167. 10.1016/j.compag.2012.05.012 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources