Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;101(10):1048-1056.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14437. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function-A prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function-A prospective cohort study

Catharina Forsgren et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Hysterectomy is one of the most common major surgical procedures in women. The effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor and sexual function are uncertain. Our objective was to investigate the effects of hysterectomy for benign indications on pelvic floor and sexual function and to compare different modes of surgery.

Material and methods: We performed a prospective clinical cohort study. In all, 260 women scheduled for hysterectomy answered validated questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Female Sexual Function Index). Participants were followed 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistics and mixed effect models.

Results: Women with subtotal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and previous prolapse/incontinence surgery were excluded from further analysis, leaving the remaining cohort to 242 patients. The response rate at 6 months and 1 year follow-up was 180/242 (74.3%) and 169/242 (69.8%), respectively. There was an improvement of pelvic floor function at both follow-ups; mean score of Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire at baseline was 42.5 (51.7), at 6 months 19.9 (42.2) and at 1 year 23.7 (50.3) (p < 0.001). The mean score of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory at baseline was 69.6 (51.1), at 6 months 49 (43.2) and at 1 year 49 (43.2) (p < 0.001). There was an improvement of sexual function after 6 months (mean score of Female Sexual Function Index at baseline 17.9 [SD 11.7] and at 6 months 21.0 [SD 11.7]) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in pelvic floor or sexual function when comparing surgical techniques.

Conclusions: Robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy improve pelvic floor function to the same extent at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. There was an overall improvement of sexual function 6 months after hysterectomy, but this did not persist after 1 year.

Keywords: abdominal hysterectomy; female sexual function; laparoscopic hysterectomy; minimally invasive surgery; pelvic floor function; robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Catharina Forsgren and Ulrika Johannesson received a clinical research grant from Intuitive Surgical. Martina Amato reports no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart showing the original cohort of 260 women and the cohort of 242 women remaining for analysis of Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Female Sexual Function Index after excluding subtotal hysterectomy, previous incontinence or prolapse surgery, vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean score of Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire‐7 (PFIQ‐7), Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ‐7), Colorectal‐Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ‐7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ‐7), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI‐20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI‐6), Colorectal‐Anal Distress Inventory (CRAD‐8) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI‐6) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months follow‐up (mean score with 95% confidence interval).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean score of Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire‐7 (PFIQ‐7), Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ‐7), Colorectal‐Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ‐7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ‐7), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI‐20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI‐6), Colorectal‐Anal Distress Inventory (CRAD‐8) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI‐6) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months follow‐up (mean score with 95% confidence interval). Operation type: Robotic = robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy; Laparoscopic = total laparoscopic hysterectomy; Abdominal = abdominal hysterectomy.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
(A) Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score and domains in all women (n = 242) at baseline (before hysterectomy) at 6 months and 12 months follow‐up (median score with 95% confidence interval). (B) Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score and domains in sexually active women (n = 162) at baseline (before hysterectomy) at 6 months and 12 months follow‐up (median score with 95% confidence interval).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:233‐241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turner LC, Shepherd JP, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Hysterectomy surgery trends: a more accurate depiction of the last decade? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:277.e1‐277.e7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moawad G, Liu E, Song C, Fu AZ. Movement to outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications in the United States, 2008‐2014. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188812. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:141‐148. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forsgren C, Lundholm C, Johansson ALV, Cnattingius S, Zetterström J, Altman D. Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:43‐48. - PubMed