Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 12;12(8):281.
doi: 10.3390/bs12080281.

Adaptation of an Emotional Stroop Test for Screening of Suicidal Ideation in Portugal

Affiliations

Adaptation of an Emotional Stroop Test for Screening of Suicidal Ideation in Portugal

Graça Esgalhado et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Cognitive instruments, especially those with emotional components, may be useful to address the limitations of self-report scales commonly used to assess suicidal ideation. The aim of this study was to develop an emotional Stroop test for screening suicidal ideation in Portugal. The project was developed in five phases using different samples for each phase. The first two phases were focused on the formulation of the potential words that would compose the slides. For this purpose, five biology teachers (neutral slide) and five mental health professionals (positive and negative slides) were invited to help choose the words that were most representative for each slide. The third phase validated the words defined in the previous phase. In this phase, 300 university students participated (Mage = 21.66; SD = 3.67; 68% female). They rated the words on a Likert scale in terms of their frequency of use, familiarity, level of understanding, and degree of image evocation. In the fourth phase, the researchers developed the complete version of the test, which consists of three slides with neutral, positive, and negative emotional stimuli, consecutively. Finally, in the fifth phase, we validated the final version of the test through a comparative study between a clinical group and a non-clinical group, each one composed by 50 participants (Mage = 32; SD = 9.70; 55% female). Results indicated that the clinical group demonstrated significantly higher scores for depression and suicidal ideation and lower scores for the three Stroop tasks. Words related to negative emotions were strongly correlated with suicidal ideation. Finally, the three Stroop slides explained 74.1% of the variance in suicidal ideation. These findings suggest that this test can be a viable complementary measure in the psychological assessment of suicide ideation, and intervention in the field of suicide prevention in Portugal.

Keywords: Portugal; emotional Stroop test; screening; suicidal ideation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The ten neutral words.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The ten positive words.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The ten negative words.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Suicide. [(accessed on 6 June 2022)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide.
    1. Turecki G., Brent D.A., Gunnell D., O’Connor R.C., Oquendo M.A., Pirkis J., Stanley B.H. Suicide and suicide risk. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2019;5:74. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0121-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baghani E., Fata L., Salehi M., Hasani F. Prediction of Suicide Ideation Based on the Attentional Bias in Clinical and Non-clinical Populations. IJPCP. 2020;26:76–101. doi: 10.32598/ijpcp.26.1.3170.1. - DOI
    1. King C.A., Jiang Q., Czyz E.K., Kerr D.R. Suicidal ideation of psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents has one-year predictive validity for suicide attempts in girls only. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2014;42:467–477. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9794-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Beurs D., Fried E.I., Wetherall K., Cleare S., O’Connor D.B., Ferguson E., O’Carroll R.E., O’Connor R.C. Exploring the psychology of suicidal ideation: A theory driven network analysis. Behav. Res. Ther. 2019;120:103419. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103419. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources