Misinformation and Facts about Breast Cancer Screening
- PMID: 36005183
- PMCID: PMC9406995
- DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080445
Misinformation and Facts about Breast Cancer Screening
Abstract
Quality medical practice is based on science and evidence. For over a half-century, the efficacy of breast cancer screening has been challenged, particularly for women aged 40-49. As each false claim has been raised, it has been addressed and refuted based on science and evidence. Nevertheless, misinformation continues to be promoted, resulting in confusion for women and their physicians. Early detection has been proven to save lives for women aged 40-74 in randomized controlled trials of mammography screening. Observational studies, failure analyses, and incidence of death studies have provided evidence that there is a major benefit when screening is introduced to the general population. In large part due to screening, there has been an over 40% decline in deaths from breast cancer since 1990. Nevertheless, misinformation about screening continues to be promoted, adding to the confusion. Despite claims to the contrary, a careful reading of the guidelines issued by major groups such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the American College of Physicians shows that they all agree that most lives are saved by screening starting at the age of 40. There is no scientific support for using the age of 50 as a threshold for screening. All women should be provided with the facts and not false information about breast cancer screening so that they can make "informed decisions" for themselves about whether to participate.
Keywords: breast; cancer; screening.
Conflict of interest statement
D.B.K. receives royalties from IZI Medical and is a consultant to DART Imaging, which makes mammography devices for China.
Similar articles
-
Lifting the fog of confusion about breast cancer screening guidelines: Surprise - it's about the money!Clin Imaging. 2020 Nov;67:5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 17. Clin Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32497997
-
More than a Half Century of Misinformation About Breast Cancer Screening.Radiol Clin North Am. 2024 Nov;62(6):993-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 May 4. Radiol Clin North Am. 2024. PMID: 39393857 Review.
-
Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.Syst Rev. 2024 May 28;13(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02539-8. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38807191 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence to Support Screening Women Annually.Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 May;55(3):441-456. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.12.003. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28411672 Review.
-
Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007;7(1):1-32. Epub 2007 Jan 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007. PMID: 23074501 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Progress and Remaining Gaps in the Early Detection and Treatment of Breast Cancer.Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 8;30(3):3201-3205. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030242. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36975455 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer screening and early diagnosis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 10.72 million women.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-02924-4. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 38321439 Free PMC article.
-
Prioritising Key Concepts for informed health choices in cancer: An evidence-based online educational programme.PEC Innov. 2024 Jun 20;5:100311. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100311. eCollection 2024 Dec 15. PEC Innov. 2024. PMID: 39027229 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kopans D.B. Informed decision making: Age of 50 is arbitrary and has no demonstrated influence on breast cancer screening in women. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;185:177–182. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials