Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 8;10(8):147.
doi: 10.3390/dj10080147.

The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics

Affiliations

The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics

Sabina Saccomanno et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, there have been many innovations in orthodontic diagnosis and therapy. Among the innovations, there is the taking of dental impressions (DIs). Dental impressions are the negative imprint of hard and soft tissues of one or both arches, and they allow a plaster model to be formed, i.e., a positive reproduction. Traditional dental impressions can be made of different materials, such as alginate, while digital impression is captured by an intra-oral scanner. Digital impression, despite the evident advantages, has not yet replaced the conventional impression. The aim of this study is to evaluate which dental impressions are the most used by dentists. For this purpose, we considered 120 questionnaires sent electronically to patients of different dental private practices from different countries, where the dentists can use both techniques. The results highlighted that the kind of impression adopted is very much influenced by the type of therapy and orthodontic devices used in the treatment. We can conclude that, despite the advent of digital technology, conventional impressions are still used for fixed devices, while digital impressions are more adopted for orthodontic customized devices and therapies with clear aligners, that are very widespread among adult patients.

Keywords: aligners; dental; dental impression materials; dental impression technique; diagnosis; digital work-flow; oral; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kruskal-Wallis Test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cervino G., Fiorillo L., Herford A.S., Laino L., Troiano G., Amoroso G., Crimi S., Matarese M., D’Amico C., Nastro Siniscalchi E., et al. Alginate materials and dental impression technique: A current state of the art and application to dental practice. Mar. Drugs. 2018;17:18. doi: 10.3390/md17010018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ting-Shu S., Jian S. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review. J. Prosthodont. 2015;24:313–321. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12218. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin C.B., Chalmers E.V., McIntyre G.T., Cochrane H., Mossey P.A. Orthodontic scanners: What’s available? J. Orthod. 2015;42:136–143. doi: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inchingolo A.D., Patano A., Coloccia G., Ceci S., Inchingolo A.M., Marinelli G., Malcangi G., Di Pede C., Garibaldi M., Ciocia A.M., et al. Treatment of Class III Malocclusion and Anterior Crossbite with Aligners: A Case Report. Medicina. 2022;58:603. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050603. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cicciù M., Fiorillo L., D’Amico C., Gambino D., Amantia E.M., Laino L., Crimi S., Campagna P., Bianchi A., Herford A.S., et al. 3D Digital Impression Systems Compared with Traditional Techniques in Dentistry: A Recent Data Systematic Review. Materials. 2020;13:1982. doi: 10.3390/ma13081982. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources