Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 20;66(9):e0078122.
doi: 10.1128/aac.00781-22. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Global Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii- calcoaceticus Complex Collected from 2016 to 2021

Affiliations

In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Global Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii- calcoaceticus Complex Collected from 2016 to 2021

James A Karlowsky et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination designed to treat serious Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) infections, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. The current study characterized the in vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam against a collection of 5,032 ABC clinical isolates collected in 33 countries across the Asia/South Pacific region, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and North America from 2016 to 2021. The sulbactam-durlobactam MIC50 and MIC90 were 1 and 2 μg/mL, respectively, for all ABC isolates tested. The addition of durlobactam (at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/mL) to sulbactam decreased its MIC50 by 8-fold (from 8 to 1 μg/mL) and its MIC90 by 32-fold (from 64 to 2 μg/mL) for all ABC isolates. The in vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam was maintained across individual ABC species, years, global regions of collection, specimen sources, and resistance phenotypes, including MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates. At 4 μg/mL (preliminary sulbactam-durlobactam susceptible MIC breakpoint), sulbactam-durlobactam inhibited 98.3% of all ABC isolates and >96% of sulbactam-, imipenem-, ciprofloxacin-, amikacin-, and minocycline-non-susceptible isolates; as well as colistin-resistant, MDR, and XDR isolates. Most imipenem-non-susceptible ABC isolates (96.8%, 2,488/2,570) were carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB); 96.9% (2,410/2,488) of CRAB isolates were sulbactam-durlobactam-susceptible. More than 80% of ABC isolates had sulbactam-durlobactam MIC values that were ≥2 doubling-dilutions (4-fold) lower than sulbactam alone. Only 1.7% (84/5,032) of ABC isolates from 2016 to 2021 had sulbactam-durlobactam MIC values of >4 μg/mL. Of the 84 isolates, 94.0% were A. baumannii, 4.8% were A. pittii, and 1.2% were A. nosocomialis. In summary, sulbactam-durlobactam demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against a 2016 to 2021 collection of geographically diverse clinical isolates of ABC isolates, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and MDR isolates.

Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex; ETX2514; carbapenem-resistant; multidrug-resistant; sulbactam-durlobactam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare a conflict of interest. J.A.K. is a consultant to IHMA and M.A.H. is an employee of IHMA. J.A.K. and M.A.H. have no personal financial interest in the sponsor of this paper (Entasis Therapeutics). S.M.M. and A.A.M. are employees and shareholders of Entasis Therapeutics.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Sulbactam-durlobactam (black bars) and sulbactam (gray bars) MIC distributions for 5,032 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) species collected globally from 2016 to 2021.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moubareck CA, Halat DH. 2020. Insights into Acinetobacter baumannii: a review of microbiological, virulence, and resistance traits in a threatening nosocomial pathogen. Antibiotics (Basel) 9:119. doi:10.3390/antibiotics9030119. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong D, Nielsen TB, Bonomo RA, Pantapalangkoor P, Luna B, Spellberg B. 2017. Clinical and pathophysiological overview of Acinetobacter infections: a century of challenges. Clin Microbiol Rev 30:409–447. doi:10.1128/CMR.00058-16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanafani ZA, Kanj SS. 2022. Acinetobacter infection: treatment and prevention. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan de Rijn, The Netherlands.https://www.uptodate.com/contents/acinetobacter-infection-treatment-and-.... Accessed 1 March 2022.
    1. Gales AC, Seifert H, Gur D, Castanheira M, Jones RN, Sader HS. 2019. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates: results from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1997–2016). Open Forum Infect Dis 6:S34–S46. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy293. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Potron A, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2015. Emerging broad-spectrum resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms and epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:568–585. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.03.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources