A model to predict difficult airway alerts after videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airways - the VIDIAC score
- PMID: 36006056
- DOI: 10.1111/anae.15841
A model to predict difficult airway alerts after videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airways - the VIDIAC score
Abstract
A model to classify the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation has yet to be established. The videolaryngoscopic intubation and difficult airway classification (VIDIAC) study aimed to develop one based on variables associated with difficult videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation. We studied 374 videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubations in 320 adults scheduled for ear, nose and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery, for whom airway management was expected to be difficult. The primary outcome was whether an anaesthetist issued a 'difficult airway alert' after videolaryngoscopy. An alert was issued after 183 (49%) intubations. Random forest and lasso regression analysis selected six intubation-related variables associated with issuing an alert: impaired epiglottic movement; increased lifting force; direct epiglottic lifting; vocal cords clearly visible; vocal cords not visible; and enlarged arytenoids. Internal validation was performed by a 10-fold cross-validation, repeated 20 times. The mean (SD or 95%CI) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92 (0.05) for the cross validated coefficient model and 0.92 (0.89-0.95) for a simplified unitary score (VIDIAC score with component values of -1 or 1 only). The calibration belt for the coefficient model was consistent with observed alert probabilities, from 0% to 100%, while the unitary VIDIAC score overestimated probabilities < 20% and underestimated probabilities > 70%. Discrimination of the VIDIAC score for patients more or less likely to be issued an alert was better than discrimination by the Cormack-Lehane classification, with mean (95%CI) areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (0.89-0.95) vs. 0.75 (0.70-0.80), respectively, p < 0.001. Our model and score can be used to calculate the probabilities of difficult airway alerts after videolaryngoscopy.
Keywords: airway management; intubation; laryngoscopy.
© 2022 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.
Comment in
-
Investigation of tracheal intubation operator and patients in difficult airway study.Anaesthesia. 2023 Jan;78(1):125. doi: 10.1111/anae.15870. Epub 2022 Sep 21. Anaesthesia. 2023. PMID: 36130817 No abstract available.
References
-
- Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, Fourth National Audit P. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2011; 106: 617-31.
-
- Huitink JM, Lie PP, Heideman I, Jansma EP, Greif R, van Schagen N, Schauer A. A prospective, cohort evaluation of major and minor airway management complications during routine anaesthetic care at an academic medical centre. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 42-8.
-
- Joffe AM, Aziz MF, Posner KL, Duggan LV, Mincer SL, Domino KB. Management of difficult tracheal intubation: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2019; 131: 818-29.
-
- de Carvalho CC, da Silva DM, Lemos VM, et al. Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in tracheal intubation in adults: a ranking systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2022; 77: 326-38.
-
- Heidegger T. Management of the Difficult Airway. New England Journal of Medicine 2021; 384: 1836-47.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
