Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 6;10(8):456.
doi: 10.3390/toxics10080456.

Antibiotics in Raw Meat Samples: Estimation of Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment

Athina Stavroulaki  1   2 , Manolis N Tzatzarakis  1 , Vasiliki Karzi  1 , Ioanna Katsikantami  1 , Elisavet Renieri  1 , Elena Vakonaki  1 , Maria Avgenaki  1 , Athanasios Alegakis  1 , Miriana Stan  3 , Matthaios Kavvalakis  1 , Apostolos K Rizos  2 , Aristidis Tsatsakis  1
Affiliations

Antibiotics in Raw Meat Samples: Estimation of Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment

Athina Stavroulaki et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

The extensive use of antibiotics in livestock farming poses increased concerns for human health as residues of these substances are present in edible tissues. The aim of this study was the determination of the levels of four groups of antibiotics (sulfonamides-SAs, tetracyclines-TCs, streptomycines-STr and quinolones-QNLs) in meat samples (muscles, livers and kidneys from beef, chicken and pork) and the estimation of the dietary exposure to antibiotics from meat consumption and the potential hazard for human health. Fifty-four samples of raw meat were randomly collected in 2018 from the Cretan market, Greece and analyzed both with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). According to the results derived from the ELISA method, only 2% of the meat samples were free from antibiotics, 2% were detected with 4 antibiotics and the great majority of the samples (87%) were detected with 2 to 3 antibiotics. SAs presented the highest detection frequencies for all samples whereas TCs were not detected in any bovine sample. The highest median concentration was detected for STr in bovine muscles (182.10 μg/kg) followed by QNLs (93.36 μg/kg) in pork kidneys whereas the chicken samples had higher burdens of QNLs compared to the other meat samples. LC-MS analysis showed that oxytetracycline (OTC) was the most common antibiotic in all samples. The highest median concentration of all antibiotics was detected for doxycycline (DOX) (181.73 μg/kg in pork kidney) followed by OTC in bovine liver (74.46 μg/kg). Risk characterization was applied for each of the two methods; The hazard quotients (HQ) did not exceed 0.059 for the ELISA method and 0.113 for the LC-MS method for any group of antibiotics, whereas the total hazard indexes (HI) were 0.078 and 0.021, respectively. The results showed the presence of different groups of antibiotics in meat from the Cretan market and that the health risk to antibiotics is low. A risk assessment analysis conducted for meat consumption and corrected for the aggregated exposure revealed no risk for the consumers.

Keywords: antibiotics; meat; quinolones; risk assessment; streptomycines; sulfonamides; tetracyclines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage detection of the investigated antibiotics in all meat samples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median concentrations of the investigated antibiotics (μg/kg) determined by the ELISA protocol in all meat samples.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Diaz-Sanchez S., Moscoso S., Solís de los Santos F., Andino A., Hanning I. Antibiotic use in poultry; A driving force for organic poultry production. Food Prot. Trends. 2015;35:440–447.
    1. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on Additives for Use in Animal Nutrition. [(accessed on 29 November 2018)]. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32003R1831.
    1. Baynes R.E., Dedonder K., Kissell L., Mzyk D., Marmulak T., Smith G., Riviere J.E. Health concerns and management of select veterinary drug residues. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016;88:112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.12.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Directive 2004/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 Amending Directive 2001/82/EC on the Community Code Relating to Veterinary Medicinal Products. [(accessed on 29 November 2018)]. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32004L0028.
    1. Kuriyama T., Karasawa T., Williams D.W. Chapter Thirteen-Antimicrobial Chemotherapy: Significance to Healthcare. In: Steven L., David P., Williams W., Randle J., Cooper T., editors. Biofilms in Infection Prevention and Control. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2014. pp. 209–244.

LinkOut - more resources