Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 14;14(8):552.
doi: 10.3390/toxins14080552.

Mycotoxins in Cattle Feed and Feed Ingredients in Brazil: A Five-Year Survey

Affiliations

Mycotoxins in Cattle Feed and Feed Ingredients in Brazil: A Five-Year Survey

Gabriela L Biscoto et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by a variety of fungi, which when ingested can cause several deleterious effects to the health of humans and animals. In this work, the detection and quantification of six major mycotoxins (aflatoxins-AFLA, deoxynivalenol-DON, fumonisins-FUMO, ochratoxin A-OTA, T-2 toxin-T-2 and zearalenone-ZON) in 1749 samples of feed and feed ingredients for cattle, collected in Brazil between 2017 and 2021, was carried out using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In total, 97% of samples were contaminated with at least one mycotoxin, yet, very few samples exceeded the lowest European Union guidance values for cattle, and the estimated daily intake also showed a low risk for the animals. However, co-occurrences were widely observed, as 87% of samples contained two or more mycotoxins at the same time, and the presence of more than one mycotoxin at the same time in feed can lead to interactions. In conclusion, the contamination of feed and feed ingredients for cattle with mycotoxins in Brazil is very common. Hence, the monitoring of these mycotoxins is of significant importance for food safety.

Keywords: ELISA; TMR; aflatoxins; co-occurrences; deoxynivalenol; feed; maize; silages; zearalenone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of contaminated and not contaminated samples and median of positive samples for (a) AFLA, (b) DON, (c) FUMO, (d) OTA, (e) T-2 and (f) ZON for each studied year (2017–2021). Numbers above the bars represent the number of analyzed samples each year.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative frequency of samples contaminated with zero, one, two, three, four, five or six mycotoxins at the same time. Numbers in parentheses are the total sample number.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimated daily intake (EDI) of mycotoxins in TMR for beef cattle (black bars) and dairy cattle (grey bars).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of samples per state of origin. The number of analyzed samples for each state are given (n).

References

    1. Hussein H.S., Brasel J.M. Toxicity, metabolism, and impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Toxicology. 2001;167:101–134. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00471-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal, and Human Systems. Volume 139. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology; Ames, IA, USA: 2003. CAST Report; p. 199.
    1. Freire F.d.C.O., Vieira I.G.P., Guedes M.I.F., Mendes F.N.P. Micotoxinas: Importância na alimentação e na saúde humana e animal. Embrapa Agroind.Trop. 2007;110:48.
    1. Bhat R., Miller J. Food, Nutrition and Agriculture-Food for the Future. FAO; Rome, Italy: 1991. Mycotoxins and food supply; p. 16.
    1. Mitchell N.J., Bowers E., Hurburgh C., Wu F. Potential economic losses to the US corn industry from aflatoxin contamination. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2016;33:540–550. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2016.1138545. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources