Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;93(3):915-933.
doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-10001-y. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

The Utilization of a Rapid Agitation Scale and Treatment Protocol for Patient and Staff Safety in an Inpatient Psychiatric Setting

Affiliations

The Utilization of a Rapid Agitation Scale and Treatment Protocol for Patient and Staff Safety in an Inpatient Psychiatric Setting

Tessa Manning et al. Psychiatr Q. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Agitation is a common and potentially dangerous condition requiring rapid recognition and treatment in acute psychiatric units. Prompt intervention can prevent a patient with agitation from harming themselves, harming others, or needing restraints or seclusion. After the review of numerous guidelines, the Modified Agitation Severity Scale (MASS) agitation treatment protocol was developed to identify and manage agitation in an inpatient adult psychiatric setting. This protocol involved modifying an existing agitation scale and pairing scores with a treatment algorithm to indicate which behavioral and medication interventions would be most appropriate. All scoring and interventions were recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). Three months of data were collected before and after the protocol was implemented. The new, modified scale had high reliability and correlated well with another validated agitation scale. Perceived patient safety was high during both study phases. Nurses' perceptions of safety trended upward after the protocol was implemented, though these differences were not significant, likely due to insufficient power. Although there was no decrease in seclusion events after implementation of the treatment protocol, there was a 44% decrease in restraint events and average restraint minutes per incident. Despite a potential increase in workload for nursing staff, implementation of the protocol did not increase burnout scores. Physicians continued to order the protocol for 55% of patients after the study period ended. These findings suggest that including a rapid agitation assessment and protocol within the EMR potentially improves nurses' perceptions of unit safety, helps assess treatment response, reduces time patients spend restrained, and supports decision making for nurses.

Keywords: (4–6): agitation; Agitation severity scale; Inpatient; MASS; Psychiatric medication; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study Design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Nursing Survey Results
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Initial MASS Scores
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Average Restraint Minutes per incident

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garriga M, et al. Assessment and management of agitation in psychiatry: Expert consensus. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2016;17(2):86–128. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2015.1132007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caruso R, et al. Aggressive behavior and psychiatric inpatients: a narrative review of the literature with a focus on the European experience. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021;23(5). 10.1007/s11920-021-01233-z. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornaggia CM, et al. Aggression in psychiatry wards: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2011;189(1):10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.12.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hankin CS, Bronstone A, Koran LM. Agitation in the inpatient psychiatric setting: a review of clinical presentation, burden, and treatment. J Psychiatr Pract. 2011;17(3):170–185. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000398410.21374.7d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams AMN. Caring for patients displaying agitated behaviours in the intensive care unit - A mixed-methods systematic review. Austrailian Critical Care. 2021;35(4):454–465. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.05.011. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources