Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Aug 25;24(8):e36000.
doi: 10.2196/36000.

Effects of a WeChat-Based Life Review Program for Patients With Digestive System Cancer: 3-Arm Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of a WeChat-Based Life Review Program for Patients With Digestive System Cancer: 3-Arm Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial

Meihua Zheng et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with digestive system cancer often experience psychospiritual distress. Life review is an evidence-based psychological intervention for patients with cancer, but the effects of digital life review programs are unclear, especially for patients with digestive system cancer.

Objective: We examined the effects of a WeChat-based life review program on the psychospiritual well-being of patients with digestive system cancer.

Methods: This study was a 3-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients with digestive system cancer were recruited from a university hospital in Fujian, China. They were randomized to a life review group and 2 control groups. All participants received routine care, and the life review group also received the 4-week WeChat-based life review program. Control group 1 also received a 4-week program of friendly visiting. Anxiety, depression, hope, and self-transcendence were measured at baseline and 2 days, 1 month, and 6 months after the intervention.

Results: A total of 150 participants were randomly allocated to the WeChat-based life review group (n=50), control group 1 (n=50), or control group 2 (n=50). The overall dropout rate was 10% (15/150), and 92% (46/50) of participants in the the life review group completed the intervention. Significant interaction effects for time and group membership were found for anxiety (P<.001), depression (P<.001), hope (P<.001), and self-transcendence (P<.001) at all follow-up time points. For anxiety and depression, the scores did not differ significantly between the life review group and control group 1 on day 2 (P=.80 for anxiety, P=.51 for depression), but the scores were significantly lower in the life review group at month 1 and month 6 (P=.02 for anxiety at both months 1 and 6; P=.003 and P<.001 for depression at months 1 and 6, respectively). Significant increases in hope and self-transcendence were revealed in the life review group compared to control group participants at all follow-up sessions.

Conclusions: The WeChat-based life review program was effective in reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms and in improving the level of hope and self-transcendence among patients with digestive system cancer. Though friendly visiting can also help to relieve anxiety, its effects are short-term.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-IOR-17011998; https://tinyurl.com/5acycpd4.

Keywords: anxiety; cancer; depression; digestive system; digestive system cancer; digital technology; distress; hope; life review; psychological; randomized controlled trial; self-transcendence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in the mean scores for anxiety, depression, hope, and self-transcendence in the patients over time. CG1: control group 1; CG2: control group 2; LRG: life review group; T0: baseline; T1: 2 days postintervention; T2: 1 month postintervention; T3: 6 months postintervention.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zamani M, Alizadeh-Tabari S. Anxiety and depression prevalence in digestive cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Aug 20;:bmjspcare-2021-003275. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003275.bmjspcare-2021-003275 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu J, Zeng Y, Tan Y, Fu B, Qiu H. Effects of hospice care on quality of life and negative emotions in patients with advanced tumor: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020 Jul 02;99(27):e20784. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020784. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020784.00005792-202007020-00040 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connolly M, Timmins F. Spiritual Care for Individuals with Cancer: The Importance of Life Review as a Tool for Promoting Spiritual Well-Being. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;37(5):151209. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151209. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749-2081(21)00116-9 S0749-2081(21)00116-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teo I, Krishnan A, Lee GL. Psychosocial interventions for advanced cancer patients: A systematic review. Psychooncology. 2019 Jul;28(7):1394–1407. doi: 10.1002/pon.5103. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types