Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Feb 9;25(3):430-437.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac206.

The Impact of The Real Cost Vaping and Smoking Ads across Tobacco Products

Sarah D Kowitt  1   2 , Jennifer Mendel Sheldon  2   3 , Rhyan N Vereen  4 , Rachel T Kurtzman  3 , Nisha C Gottfredson  3 , Marissa G Hall  2   3   5 , Noel T Brewer  2   3 , Seth M Noar  2   4   6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Impact of The Real Cost Vaping and Smoking Ads across Tobacco Products

Sarah D Kowitt et al. Nicotine Tob Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Little research has examined the spillover effects of tobacco communication campaigns, such as how anti-smoking ads affect vaping.

Aims and methods: Participants were a national sample of 623 U.S. adolescents (ages 13-17 years) from a probability-based panel. In a between-subjects experiment, we randomly assigned adolescents to view one of four videos online: (1) a smoking prevention video ad from the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) The Real Cost campaign, (2) a neutral control video about smoking, (3) a vaping prevention video ad from The Real Cost campaign, or (4) a neutral control video about vaping. We present effect sizes as Cohen's d, standardized mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Exposure to The Real Cost vaping prevention ads led to more negative attitudes toward vaping compared with control (d = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.53), while exposure to The Real Cost smoking prevention ads did not affect smoking-related outcomes compared with control (p-values > .05). Turning to spillover effects, exposure to The Real Cost smoking prevention ads led to less susceptibility to vaping (d = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.56, -0.12), more negative attitudes toward vaping (d = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.65) and higher perceived likelihood of harm from vaping (d = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.48), compared with control. Exposure to The Real Cost vaping prevention ads did not affect smoking-related outcomes compared with control (p-values > .05).

Conclusions: This experiment found evidence of beneficial spillover effects of smoking prevention ads on vaping outcomes and found no detrimental effects of vaping prevention ads on smoking outcomes.

Implications: Little research has examined the spillover effects of tobacco communication campaigns, such as how anti-smoking ads affect vaping. Using a national sample of 623 U.S. adolescents, we found beneficial evidence of spillover effects of smoking prevention ads on vaping outcomes, which is promising since it suggests that smoking prevention campaigns may have the additional benefit of reducing both smoking and vaping among adolescents. Additionally, we found that vaping prevention campaigns did not elicit unintended consequences on smoking-related outcomes, an important finding given concerns that vaping prevention campaigns could drive youth to increase or switch to using combustible cigarettes instead of vaping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Survey design and measures.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Impact of The Real Cost ads on vaping and smoking outcomes. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals (CI).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking--50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General.2014; https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/tobacco/inde.... Accessed January 4, 2016.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD. 2012; https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-.... Accessed December 13, 2018.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking--50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD. 2014; https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/tobacco/inde.... Accessed January 4, 2016.
    1. Jamal A, Gentzke A, Hu SS, et al. . Tobacco use among middle and high school students—United States, 2011–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(23):597–603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on proposed new steps to protect youth by preventing access to flavored tobacco products and banning menthol in cigarettes.2018; https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm625884.htm. Accessed December 7, 2018.

Publication types