Association between pregnancy intention and psychological distress among women exposed to different levels of restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
- PMID: 36006931
- PMCID: PMC9409515
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273339
Association between pregnancy intention and psychological distress among women exposed to different levels of restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on the mental health of people globally. Significant concerns about health and access to services among women of reproductive age considering pregnancy may cause psychological distress, and in turn increase health risks during and after pregnancy for mothers and offspring.
Objectives: To examine the association between pregnancy intention and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, and explore if this association differed based on local viral transmission rates and corresponding levels of pandemic restrictions.
Methods: A nationwide online survey was completed by 849 non-pregnant women aged 18-50 years between 15 October and 7 November 2020. Women were asked about their intention to become pregnant, and psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Multivariable regression analysis examined associations between pregnancy intention and psychological distress. An interaction term was added to the model to examine differences in associations by level of viral transmission rates and lockdown restrictions which was determined based on postcode.
Results: Pregnancy intention was not associated with experiencing (very) high psychological distress in the overall study population (odds ratio (OR) 1.42, 95% CI 0.94, 2.11). The interaction term (p = 0.09) suggested potential differences by level of restrictions and viral transmission rates. In stratified analysis among women living in a location with strict lockdown restrictions and high viral transmission rates leading up to and during the study, those planning to become pregnant were more likely to experience (very) high psychological distress (OR 3.39, 2.04, 5.65) compared with women not planning to become pregnant. Pregnancy intention was not associated with psychological distress among women exposed to lower levels of pandemic restrictions and viral transmission rates (OR 1.17, 0.74, 1.85).
Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need to identify and support women planning pregnancy during a public health crisis to mitigate potential short- and long-term intergenerational negative health outcomes associated with psychological distress.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Psychological distress and its association with intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, discretionary foods, and alcohol in women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.Nutrition. 2022 Nov-Dec;103-104:111794. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111794. Epub 2022 Jul 17. Nutrition. 2022. PMID: 36055124 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological Distress Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults in the United Kingdom Based on Coordinated Analyses of 11 Longitudinal Studies.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e227629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7629. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35452109 Free PMC article.
-
Married women's decision to delay childbearing, and loneliness, severe psychological distress, and suicidal ideation under crisis: online survey data analysis from 2020 to 2021.BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 28;23(1):1642. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16476-z. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37641039 Free PMC article.
-
Distress Signals: Age Differences in Psychological Distress before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043549. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36834239 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative perspective.PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293189. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37883473 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
State-specific fertility rate changes across the USA following the first two waves of COVID-19.Hum Reprod. 2023 Jun 1;38(6):1202-1212. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead055. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 37038265 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological distress and its association with intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, discretionary foods, and alcohol in women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.Nutrition. 2022 Nov-Dec;103-104:111794. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111794. Epub 2022 Jul 17. Nutrition. 2022. PMID: 36055124 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing reproductive intentions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 25;23(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09551-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37231470 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions and Experiences of Inequity for Women of Refugee Background Having a Baby during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Melbourne, Australia.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;21(4):481. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040481. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38673392 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Spry EA, Wilson CA, Middleton M, Moreno-Betancur M, Doyle LW, Howard LM, et al.. Parental mental health before and during pregnancy and offspring birth outcomes: A 20-year preconception cohort of maternal and paternal exposure. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;27:100564. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100564 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials