Ultra-low CONtraSt PCI vs conVEntional PCI in patients of ACS with increased risk of CI-AKI (CONSaVE-AKI)
- PMID: 36007555
- PMCID: PMC9647695
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.08.004
Ultra-low CONtraSt PCI vs conVEntional PCI in patients of ACS with increased risk of CI-AKI (CONSaVE-AKI)
Abstract
Objectives: This prospective, randomized study assessed short-term outcomes and safety of ultra-low contrast percutaneous coronary intervention(ULC-PCI) vs conventional PCI in high risk for contrast induced acute kidney injury(CI-AKI) patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome(ACS).
Background: Patients at an increased risk of developing CI-AKI can be identified prior to PCI based on their pre-procedural risk scores. ULC-PCI is a novel contrast conservation strategy in such high risk patients for prevention of CI-AKI.
Methods: 82 patients undergoing PCI for ACS were enrolled having estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and moderate to very high pre-procedural risk of developing CI-AKI as calculated by Maioli risk calculator. They were randomized into two groups of 41 patients each of ULC-PCI (contrast volume ≤ patient's eGFR) and conventional PCI (contrast volume ≤ 3xpatient's eGFR). Primary end point was development of CI-AKI.
Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. Primary outcome of CI-AKI occurred more in patients of the conventional PCI group [7 (17.1%)] than in the ULC PCI group [(0 patients), p = 0.012]. Contrast volume (41.02 (±9.8) ml vs 112.54 (±25.18) ml; P < 0.0001) was markedly lower in the ULC-PCI group. No significant difference in secondary safety outcomes between two study arms at 30 days. IVUS was used in 17% patients in ULC PCI.
Conclusion: ULC-PCI in patients with increased risk of developing CI-AKI is feasible, appears safe, and has the potential to decrease the incidence of CI-AKI specially in resource limited setting such as ours where coronary imaging by IVUS is not possible in every patient.
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Contrast induced acute kidney injury; Contrast induced nephropathy; IVUS; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Ultra-low contrast PCI.
Copyright © 2022 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Ultra-Low Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Minimize the Risk for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jun;31(6):176-182. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00331. Epub 2019 Mar 15. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30865912
-
Effect of a Contrast Modulation System on Contrast Media Use and the Rate of Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Angiography.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1601-1610. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.007. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30139467 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;14(5):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 28. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013. PMID: 23993293
-
Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Preventing Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions/Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jan;21(1):53-63. doi: 10.1177/1074248415590197. Epub 2015 Jun 24. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016. PMID: 26112028 Review.
-
Procedural Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 14;12(19):1877-1888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.055. Epub 2019 Sep 11. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019. PMID: 31521648 Review.
Cited by
-
Microcatheter selective injection technique using ultra low contrast for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with previous acute kidney injury: a case report.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 10;12:1607466. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1607466. eCollection 2025. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 40709200 Free PMC article.
-
Baseline eGFR cutoff for increased risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department.PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293598. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37883518 Free PMC article.
-
Intravascular Imaging in Ultra-Low or Zero-Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Time Is Now?J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 4;12(23):7499. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237499. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068551 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jan 4;27(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02163-x. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025. PMID: 39754700 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of the completeness of revascularization and high bleeding risk status in acute coronary syndrome patients with multi-vessel disease: A retrospective analysis.JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Sep 17;13:20480040241283152. doi: 10.1177/20480040241283152. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2024. PMID: 39346685 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McCullough P.A., Wolyn R., Rocher L.L., Levin R.N., O'Neill W.W. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med. 1997;103(5):368–375. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous