Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Sep-Oct;74(5):363-368.
doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

Ultra-low CONtraSt PCI vs conVEntional PCI in patients of ACS with increased risk of CI-AKI (CONSaVE-AKI)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Ultra-low CONtraSt PCI vs conVEntional PCI in patients of ACS with increased risk of CI-AKI (CONSaVE-AKI)

Abhinav Shrivastava et al. Indian Heart J. 2022 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: This prospective, randomized study assessed short-term outcomes and safety of ultra-low contrast percutaneous coronary intervention(ULC-PCI) vs conventional PCI in high risk for contrast induced acute kidney injury(CI-AKI) patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome(ACS).

Background: Patients at an increased risk of developing CI-AKI can be identified prior to PCI based on their pre-procedural risk scores. ULC-PCI is a novel contrast conservation strategy in such high risk patients for prevention of CI-AKI.

Methods: 82 patients undergoing PCI for ACS were enrolled having estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and moderate to very high pre-procedural risk of developing CI-AKI as calculated by Maioli risk calculator. They were randomized into two groups of 41 patients each of ULC-PCI (contrast volume ≤ patient's eGFR) and conventional PCI (contrast volume ≤ 3xpatient's eGFR). Primary end point was development of CI-AKI.

Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. Primary outcome of CI-AKI occurred more in patients of the conventional PCI group [7 (17.1%)] than in the ULC PCI group [(0 patients), p = 0.012]. Contrast volume (41.02 (±9.8) ml vs 112.54 (±25.18) ml; P < 0.0001) was markedly lower in the ULC-PCI group. No significant difference in secondary safety outcomes between two study arms at 30 days. IVUS was used in 17% patients in ULC PCI.

Conclusion: ULC-PCI in patients with increased risk of developing CI-AKI is feasible, appears safe, and has the potential to decrease the incidence of CI-AKI specially in resource limited setting such as ours where coronary imaging by IVUS is not possible in every patient.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Contrast induced acute kidney injury; Contrast induced nephropathy; IVUS; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Ultra-low contrast PCI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. S1
Fig. S1
Fig S2
Fig S2
Fig. S3
Fig. S3
Fig. S4
Fig. S4

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McCullough P.A., Wolyn R., Rocher L.L., Levin R.N., O'Neill W.W. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med. 1997;103(5):368–375. - PubMed
    1. Sun G., Chen P., Wang K., et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy and long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Angiology. 2019;70(7):621–626. doi: 10.1177/0003319718803677. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mehran R., Aymong E.D., Nikolsky E., et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(7):1393–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azzalini L., Vilca L.M., Lombardo F., et al. Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a large cohort of all-comers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of five contrast media. Int J Cardiol. 2018;273:69–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.097. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rihal C.S., Textor S.C., Grill D.E., et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2002;105(19):2259–2264. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000016043.87291.33. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types