Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct:134:104176.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104176. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

SurvMaximin: Robust federated approach to transporting survival risk prediction models

Affiliations

SurvMaximin: Robust federated approach to transporting survival risk prediction models

Xuan Wang et al. J Biomed Inform. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: For multi-center heterogeneous Real-World Data (RWD) with time-to-event outcomes and high-dimensional features, we propose the SurvMaximin algorithm to estimate Cox model feature coefficients for a target population by borrowing summary information from a set of health care centers without sharing patient-level information.

Materials and methods: For each of the centers from which we want to borrow information to improve the prediction performance for the target population, a penalized Cox model is fitted to estimate feature coefficients for the center. Using estimated feature coefficients and the covariance matrix of the target population, we then obtain a SurvMaximin estimated set of feature coefficients for the target population. The target population can be an entire cohort comprised of all centers, corresponding to federated learning, or a single center, corresponding to transfer learning.

Results: Simulation studies and a real-world international electronic health records application study, with 15 participating health care centers across three countries (France, Germany, and the U.S.), show that the proposed SurvMaximin algorithm achieves comparable or higher accuracy compared with the estimator using only the information of the target site and other existing methods. The SurvMaximin estimator is robust to variations in sample sizes and estimated feature coefficients between centers, which amounts to significantly improved estimates for target sites with fewer observations.

Conclusions: The SurvMaximin method is well suited for both federated and transfer learning in the high-dimensional survival analysis setting. SurvMaximin only requires a one-time summary information exchange from participating centers. Estimated regression vectors can be very heterogeneous. SurvMaximin provides robust Cox feature coefficient estimates without outcome information in the target population and is privacy-preserving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic of SurvMaximin algorithm for federated transfer learning.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Average C-statistics under settings (I) and (II) with Σ being either AR(1) or compound symmetry; p = 20or50; and tau = 0.05, 0.10, or 0.20 (local coefficients’ heterogenicity) for predicting survival in the target population with risk models trained by SurvMaximin, Meta, ODAC, as well as supervised penalized Cox regression with nQ = 200, 400, 600 labeled target data (Local200, Local400, Local600).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Density plots of local versus SurvMaximin effect estimators for healthcare systems..l = 1, …, L0 = 15
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Density plots of estimated AUCs for models trained via local estimation versus SurvMaximin for healthcare systems l = 1, …, L0 = 17.

References

    1. Torda P, Han ES, Scholle SH, Easing the adoption and use of electronic health records in small practices, Health Aff. 29 (4) (2010) 668–675. - PubMed
    1. Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE, Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems, Health Aff. 31 (5) (2012) 1108–1114. - PubMed
    1. Kim Y-G, Jung K, Park Y-T, Shin D, Cho SY, Yoon D, Park RW, Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: a nation- wide survey, Int. J. Med. Inf 101 (2017) 100–107. - PubMed
    1. Tavares J, Oliveira T, Electronic health record portal adoption: a cross country analysis. In: BMC medical informatics and decision making 17.1 (2017), pp. 1–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kose I, Rayner J, Birinci S, Ulgu MM, Yilmaz I, Guner S, Mahir SK, Aycil K, Elmas BO, Volkan E, Altinbas Z, Gencyurek G, Zehir E, Gundogdu B, Ozcan M, Vardar C, Altinli B, Hasancebi JS, Adoption rates of electronic health records in Turkish Hospitals and the relation with hospital sizes, BMC Health Services Res. 20 (1) (2020). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources