Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 25;12(8):e054243.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054243.

Predictors of burnout among US healthcare providers: a systematic review

Lisa S Meredith  1 , Kathryn Bouskill  2 , Joan Chang  3 , Jody Larkin  2 , Aneesa Motala  2   4 , Susanne Hempel  2   4
Affiliations

Predictors of burnout among US healthcare providers: a systematic review

Lisa S Meredith et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: One potential barrier to optimal healthcare may be provider burnout or occupational-related stress in the workplace. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review to identify the predictors of burnout among US. healthcare providers.

Design: Systematic review using in-depth critical appraisal to assess risk of bias and present the quality of evidence in synthesised results from the prognostic studies.

Data sources: We searched 11 databases, registries, existing reviews and contacted experts through 4 October 2021.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: We included all studies evaluating potential predictors and documenting the presence and absence of associations with burnout assessed as a multidimensional construct. We excluded studies that relied solely on a single continuous subscale of burnout. Data were abstracted from eligible studies and checked for accuracy by a content expert and a methodologist.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently screened citations and full-text publications using predetermined eligibility criteria.

Results: The 141 identified studies evaluated a range of burnout predictors. Findings for demographic characteristics were conflicting or show no association. Workplace factors, such as workload, work/life balance, job autonomy and perceived support from leadership, had stronger associations with risk for burnout. Mental health factors, such as anxiety, and physical health risks may increase the risk, although the direction of these associations is unclear as few prospective studies exist to address this question. Factors such as social support appear to have a protective effect.

Conclusion: We found the most evidence for workplace, mental health and psychosocial factors in predicting burnout but limited evidence for other potential predictors. However, more prospective studies are needed to improve our understanding about how to prevent provider burnout.

Prospero registration number: CRD4202014836.

Keywords: Anxiety disorders; GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine); MENTAL HEALTH; PRIMARY CARE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of risk of bias assessment by source.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:397–422. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C. Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development International 2009;14:204–20. 10.1108/13620430910966406 - DOI
    1. Freudenberger HJ. Staff Burn-Out. J Soc Issues 1974;30:159–65. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x - DOI
    1. Kahill S. Symptoms of professional burnout: a review of the empirical evidence. Can Psychol 1988;29:284–97. 10.1037/h0079772 - DOI
    1. Maslach C. What have we learned about burnout and health? Psychol Health 2001;16:607–11. 10.1080/08870440108405530 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms