Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Aug 26;20(1):267.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02732-w.

A case study of combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Affiliations
Case Reports

A case study of combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Huiru Dai et al. World J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of patients under existing neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy requires improvement. Whereas programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have shown promising response in advanced esophageal cancer, they have not been used in the perioperative treatment of resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. Whether immunotherapy can be incorporated into neoadjuvant therapy has became a challenging question for researchers.

Case presentation: We present a case of a 65-year-old male who had a history of progressive dysphagia for approximately 1 month. He underwent pertinent studies including computed tomography (CT),gastroscopy,and pathological biopsy resulting in a diagnosis of medium-low differentiated squamous carcinoma of the thoracic segment of the esophagus (cT2N2M0 stage III). After 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, gastroscopy showed the lesion in the esophagus was no longer present. Subsequently, the patient received thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer and achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) in postoperative pathological evaluation. During the whole treatment, no adverse effect was recorded and to date no evidence of recurrence has been recorded.

Conclusion: Our report suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy not only improve the R0 resection and pCR rate in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer, but also the adverse effects are within the control range. However, the selection of therapeutic strategy, predictors of response to treatment, and interval time between neoadjuvant treatment and surgery still await more reliable evidence-based studies with large prospective samples.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Immunotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; PD-1 inhibitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pre-treatment examination: Gastroscopic findings (A, B)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pre-treatment examination: computed tomography. A, B The red arrows indicate the esophageal cancer lesions. CE The red arrows indicate the swollen lymph nodes
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pre-treatment examination: histopathological findings (A, B). The images were obtained after H&E staining under a magnification of respectively 50× and 200×
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The doses and schedules of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Post-treatment examination: gastroscopic findings (A, B), respectively middle esophagus and lower esophagus
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Post-treatment examination: computed tomography (A, B). The red arrows indicate the esophageal cancer lesions. CE The red arrows indicate lymph nodes. All of them became smaller compared with pre-treatment
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Post-treatment examination: postoperative histopathological findings (A, B). The images were obtained after H&E staining under a magnification of respectively 40× and 40×. The squamous epithelium is intact, and subepithelial proliferation of fibrous connective tissue with vasodilatation and inflammatory cell infiltration

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thrift AP. The epidemic of oesophageal carcinoma: where are we now? Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;41:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.01.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alderton GK, Bordon Y. Tumour immunotherapy--leukocytes take up the fight. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(4):237. doi: 10.1038/nri3197. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, Okada M, Lin CY, Chin K, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(11):1506–1517. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30626-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, Francois E, Adenis A, Hsu CH, et al. Randomized phase III KEYNOTE-181 study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(35):4138–4148. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01888. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types