A quantitative study of nurses perception to advance directive in selected private and public secondary healthcare facilities in Ibadan, Nigeria
- PMID: 36008832
- PMCID: PMC9404628
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00825-5
A quantitative study of nurses perception to advance directive in selected private and public secondary healthcare facilities in Ibadan, Nigeria
Abstract
Objectives: The study evaluated nurses' perceptions on the benefits, drawbacks, and their roles in initiating and implementing advance directives (AD) at private and public secondary healthcare units.
Methods: The study adopted a cross-sectional, comparative-descriptive research design and was anchored on the structural functional theory. A total of 401 nurses (131 private and 270 public) were chosen on purpose. The data was collected between January and March 2018 among nurses at the selected hospitals. Analysis was done via SPSSv28.0.1.0.
Results: Compared to nurses working in private healthcare facilities (72.5%), the majority of nurses at the public healthcare facilities (75.2%) indicated a more favorable opinion of AD's benefits and (61.9%) felt they had a substantial involvement in the development and execution of AD than their private counterpart (56.5%). Similarly, 60.7% of nurses employed by the government agreed that AD has some disadvantages compared to those employed by the private sector (58.8%). Significantly, Christian nurses are 0.53 times less likely than Muslims to contest AD's benefits; 0.78 times less likely than Muslim to disagree that AD has flaws; and 1.30 times more likely than Muslim nurses to deny they contributed to the development and execution of AD, though not significant.
Conclusion: Making decisions at the end-of-life can be challenging, thus AD should be supported across the board in the healthcare industry. Nurses should be trained on their role in developing and implementing AD, as well as on its advantages and how to deal with its challenges.
Keywords: End-of-life care; General hospital; Living will; Private hospital; Treatment preference.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the authors with regard to the research, writing, or publication of this paper.
Similar articles
-
Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jun 5;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0197-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28583175 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' perceptions of advance directives.Aten Primaria. 2014 Nov;46 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):145-9. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(14)70082-4. Aten Primaria. 2014. PMID: 25476052 Free PMC article.
-
Willingness to receive pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine among doctors and nurses in public health facilities in Ibadan, Nigeria.Vaccine. 2012 Mar 16;30(13):2315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.01.060. Epub 2012 Jan 31. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 22306857
-
Implementing advance directives-An international literature review of important considerations for nurses.J Nurs Manag. 2020 Sep;28(6):1177-1190. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13097. Epub 2020 Jul 31. J Nurs Manag. 2020. PMID: 32663341 Review.
-
Nurse roles in the advance directive system in Korea.Int Nurs Rev. 2022 Jun;69(2):159-166. doi: 10.1111/inr.12683. Epub 2021 Jun 11. Int Nurs Rev. 2022. PMID: 34115378 Review.
Cited by
-
A scoping review of clinical communication in cancer care in Africa.Oncologist. 2025 Apr 4;30(4):oyaf039. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf039. Oncologist. 2025. PMID: 40212023 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical and Legal Challenges in Caring for Older Adults with Multimorbidities: Best Practices for Nurses.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;12(16):1585. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161585. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39201144 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ernestina S, Maria N, Daniel S. Nurses’ perceptions of advance directives. researchgate.net/publication/ 2014;269:187–357.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical