A Paradigm for Targeting Functional Impairment as an Outcome in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
- PMID: 36009077
- PMCID: PMC9405930
- DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12081014
A Paradigm for Targeting Functional Impairment as an Outcome in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Abstract
Although functional impairment is required for a diagnosis in the DSM 5, the time frame and definition of functional impairment is ambiguous. We present a conceptual review clarifying the difference between functional impairment as a stable trait representing strength or disability in various domains, and functional impairment as secondary to emotional or behavior problems, which is a state sensitive to change with treatment intervention. Functional impairment as a measure of treatment outcome includes both change from baseline and status at the endpoint of treatment. When using a validated measure of function, functional improvement can be defined as the percentage of patients who achieve the Minimal Important Clinical Difference (MCID) and functional remission as the percentage of patients who normalize at treatment endpoint. True treatment remission should be defined as both symptomatic and functional remission.
Keywords: ADHD; attention deficits; endpoint treatment; functional impairment; hyperactivity; measurement; outcome; rating scales; remission.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares a conflict of interest in discussing measurement of functional impairment, in that she is the author of the WFIRS scale described in that section and receives royalties from Multi-Health Systems. Weiss has received consultant fees from Adlon, CBPartners, Tris, and Putnam Associates. She has been on the Advisory board of Idorsia and Revibe.
References
-
- Barkley R.A., Cunningham C.E., Gordon M., Faraone S.V., Lewandowski L., Murphy K.R. ADHD Symptoms vs. Impairment: Revisited. ADHD Rep. 2006;14:1–9. doi: 10.1521/adhd.2006.14.2.1. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
