Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 15;12(16):2079.
doi: 10.3390/ani12162079.

Genomic Prediction for Abortion in Lactating Holstein Dairy Cows

Affiliations

Genomic Prediction for Abortion in Lactating Holstein Dairy Cows

Robert Wijma et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Abortion in dairy cattle causes great economic losses due to reduced animal health, increase in culling rates, reduction in calf production, and milk yield, among others. Although the etiology of abortions can be of various origins, previous research has shown a genetic component. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the development of the genomic prediction for cow abortions in lactating Holstein dairy cattle based on producer-recorded data and ssGBLUP methodology and (2) evaluate the efficacy of genomic predictions for cow abortions in commercial herds of US Holstein cows using data from herds that do not contribute phenotypic information to the evaluation. We hypothesized that cows with greater genomic predictions for cow abortions (Z_Abort STA) would have a reduced incidence of abortion. Phenotypic data on abortions, pedigree, and genotypes were collected directly from commercial dairy producers upon obtaining their permission. Abortion was defined as the loss of a confirmed pregnancy after 42 and prior to 260 days of gestation, treated as a binary outcome (0, 1), and analyzed using a threshold model. Data from a different subset of animals were used to test the efficacy of the prediction. The additive genetic variance for the cow abortion trait (Z_Abort) was 0.1235 and heritability was 0.0773. For all animals with genotypes (n = 1,662,251), mean reliability was 42%, and genomic predicted transmitting abilities (gPTAs) ranged from −8.8 to 12.4. Z_Abort had a positive correlation with cow and calf health traits and reproductive traits, and a negative correlation with production traits. Z_Abort effectively identified cows with a greater or lesser risk of abortion (16.6% vs. 11.0% for the worst and best genomics groups, respectively; p < 0.0001). The inclusion of cow abortion genomic predictions in a multi-trait selection index would allow dairy producers and consultants to reduce the incidence of abortion and to select high-producing, healthier, and more profitable cows.

Keywords: Holstein; breeding strategy; cow abortion; genetics; genomics; prediction; selection index; standardized transmitting ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This research was conducted as a part of the authors’ employment with Zoetis LLC, furthering the scientific research related to the CLARIFIDE® Plus product sold by Zoetis.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of gPTAs (Z_Abort PTA) for abortion for all animals in the Holstein evaluation. An appreciable variation in gPTAs is observed in the Holstein population sampled in the present study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of abortion incidence by days of gestation at the time of abortion diagnosis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association between predicted probability of abortion and Z_Abort STAs for lactations 1 to 4.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Santos J., Thatcher W., Chebel R., Cerri R., Galvao K. The effect of embryonic death rates in cattle on the efficacy of estrus synchronization programs. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004;82:513–535. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hubbert W. Committee on bovine reproductive nomenclature. Recommendations for standardizing bovine reproductive terms. Cornell Vet. 1972;62:216–237. - PubMed
    1. De Vries A. Economic value of pregnancy in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:3876–3885. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72430-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cabrera V. A simple formulation and solution to the replacement problem: A practical tool to assess the economic cow value, the value of a new pregnancy, and the cost of a pregnancy loss. J. Dairy Sci. 2012;95:4683–4698. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5214. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wijma R., Stangaferro M., Giordano J. 1268 Reproductive performance and culling dynamics of lactating dairy cows with detected pregnancy loss. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:611–612. doi: 10.2527/jam2016-1268. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources