Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 22;12(16):2156.
doi: 10.3390/ani12162156.

Anti-Predation Responses to Conspecific versus Heterospecific Alarm Calls by the Nestlings of Two Sympatric Birds

Affiliations

Anti-Predation Responses to Conspecific versus Heterospecific Alarm Calls by the Nestlings of Two Sympatric Birds

Yuxin Jiang et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Predation is generally the main cause of bird mortality. Birds can use acoustic signals to increase their predation survival. Bird response to mobbing alarm calls is a form of anti-predation behavior. We used a playback technique and acoustic analysis to study the function of mobbing alarm calls in the parent-offspring communication of two sympatric birds, the vinous throated parrotbill (Sinosuthora webbianus) and oriental reed warbler (Acrocephalus orientalis). The chicks of these two species responded to conspecific and heterospecific mobbing alarm calls by suppressing their begging behavior. The mobbing alarm calls in these two species were similar. Mobbing alarm calls play an important role in parent-offspring communication, and chicks can eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls to increase their own survival. Eavesdropping behavior and the similarity of alarm call acoustics suggest that the evolution of alarm calls is conservative and favors sympatric birds that have coevolved to use the same calls to reduce predation risk.

Keywords: call recognition; eavesdropping; mobbing alarm calls; parent–offspring communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the begging duration from nests as a response toward playback stimuli between (A) VP and (B) ORW in the playback experiment. The red points and whiskers represent the mean and standard errors of the observed data, respectively. The black points represent the raw data, while treatments with the same/different letters indicate the nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.05)/significant (p < 0.05) differences in responses, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the number of begging calls from nests as a response to playback stimuli between (A) VP and (B) ORW in the playback experiment. The red points and whiskers represent the mean and standard errors of the observed data, respectively. The black points represent the raw data, while treatments with the same/different letters indicate the nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.05)/significant (p < 0.05) differences in responses, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of the number of beak-openings from nests as a response toward playback stimuli between (A) VP and (B) ORW in the playback experiment. The red points and whiskers represent the mean and standard errors of the observed data, respectively. The black points represent the raw data, while treatments with the same/different letters indicate the nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.05)/significant (p < 0.05) differences in responses, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Caro T.M. Antipredatory Defenses in Birds and Mammals. The University Chicago; Chicago, IL, USA: 2005.
    1. Zuberbühler K. Predator-specific alarm calls in Campbell’s monkeys, Cercopithecus campbelli. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2001;50:414–422. doi: 10.1007/s002650100383. - DOI
    1. Gill S.A., Bierema A.M.K. On the meaning of alarm calls: A review of functional reference in avian alarm calling. Ethology. 2013;119:449–461. doi: 10.1111/eth.12097. - DOI
    1. Suzuki T.N., Wheatcroft D., Griesser M. Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird calls. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10986. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10986. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manser M.B. The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proceed. R. Soc. B. 2001;268:2315–2324. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1773. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources