Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
- PMID: 36009768
- PMCID: PMC9405203
- DOI: 10.3390/biology11081141
Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
Abstract
Urbanization creates new ecological conditions that can affect biodiversity at all levels, including the diversity and prevalence of parasites of species that may occupy these environments. However, few studies have compared bird-ectoparasite interactions between urban and rural individuals. Here, we analyze the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns of urban and rural burrowing owls, Athene cunicularia, to assess the influence of host traits (i.e., sex, age, and weight), and environmental factors (i.e., number of conspecifics per nest, habitat type and aridity) on its composition. Ectoparasites of burrowing owls included two lice, one flea, and one mite. The overall prevalence for mites, lice and fleas was 1.75%, 8.76% and 3.50%, respectively. A clear pattern of co-infection was detected between mites and fleas and, to less extent, between mites and lice. Adult owls harbored fewer ectoparasites than nestlings, and adult females harbored more lice than males. Our results also show that mite and flea numbers were higher when more conspecifics cohabited the same burrow, while lice showed the opposite pattern. Rural individuals showed higher flea parasitism and lower mite parasitism than urban birds. Moreover, mite numbers were negatively correlated with aridity and host weight. Although the ectoparasitic load of burrowing owls appears to be influenced by individual age, sex, number of conspecifics per nest, and habitat characteristics, the pattern of co-infection found among ectoparasites could also be mediated by unexplored factors such as host immune response, which deserves further research.
Keywords: Athene cunicularia; co-infection; ectoparasites; fleas; lice; mites; urban ecology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
[Structure and seasonal dynamics of the biotic community ectoparasites of the bank vole in the Il'men'-Volkhov lowland].Parazitologiia. 2002 Nov-Dec;36(6):433-46. Parazitologiia. 2002. PMID: 12624960 Russian.
-
Influence of bill and foot morphology on the ectoparasites of barn owls.J Parasitol. 2012 Apr;98(2):256-61. doi: 10.1645/GE-2888.1. Epub 2011 Oct 19. J Parasitol. 2012. PMID: 22010835
-
Burrowing Owls, Pulex irritans, and Plague.Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015 Sep;15(9):556-64. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1772. Epub 2015 Sep 14. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015. PMID: 26367482
-
Burrowing owls as potential phoretic hosts of ground squirrel fleas during a plague epizootic.J Vector Ecol. 2021 Jun;46(1):48-56. doi: 10.52707/1081-1710-46.1.48. J Vector Ecol. 2021. PMID: 35229581
-
Epidemiology of Ectoparasites (Ticks, Lice, and Mites) in the Livestock of Pakistan: A Review.Front Vet Sci. 2021 Dec 16;8:780738. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.780738. eCollection 2021. Front Vet Sci. 2021. PMID: 34977213 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Unveiling the urban colonization of the Asian water monitor (Varanus salvator) across its distribution range using citizen science.PeerJ. 2024 Aug 22;12:e17357. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17357. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 39184396 Free PMC article.
-
Birds in arid regions have depauperate louse communities: Climate change implications?Ecol Evol. 2024 Sep 12;14(9):e70280. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70280. eCollection 2024 Sep. Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 39267692 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Krasnov B.R., Poulin R., Mouillot D. Scale-dependence of phylogenetic signal in ecological traits of ectoparasites. Ecography. 2011;34:114–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06502.x. - DOI
-
- Veiga J. Ph.D. Dissertation. Granada University; Granada, Spain: 2020. Determinants of the Host-Parasite Relationship in a System Formed by a Cavity-Nesting Bird and its Ectoparasites in an Arid Ecosystem.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources